Published: 30th July 2025 | The English Chronicle Desk | The English Chronicle Online
As artificial intelligence continues to reshape the landscape of modern education, OpenAI has introduced a new “study mode” for its ChatGPT platform, in a move designed to combat mounting concerns that AI tools are eroding students’ ability to think critically and independently. The launch of this thoughtful new feature follows months of academic debate, research findings, and public scrutiny over the growing reliance of students on generative AI models.
For many educators, the rise of AI in the classroom has been both a gift and a growing dilemma. ChatGPT, with its ability to generate coherent essays, solve complex math problems, and provide structured arguments in seconds, has quickly become one of the most widely used educational tools around the world. But its very efficiency has sparked fears that young learners are being robbed of the deeper engagement and problem-solving processes necessary for true intellectual development.
Now, in response to these criticisms, OpenAI has taken a significant step by introducing a mode that actively encourages users to think through challenges rather than bypass them with instant solutions. The “study mode” prompts students with guiding questions and subtle hints, nudging them toward the answer rather than delivering it outright. For instance, when asked to compare the efficiency of two algorithms, the new system would follow up with contextual queries, fostering an environment where the user must reflect and reason rather than simply receive.
The feature, developed in collaboration with learning specialists, is an optional toggle that students can activate. The standard version of ChatGPT, which continues to offer direct responses, will remain available. But OpenAI’s decision to emphasize a more interactive learning experience signals a shift in how AI companies are responding to the ethical and cognitive challenges their tools pose in the education sector.
“ChatGPT is becoming one of the most widely used learning tools in the world,” said OpenAI in a statement. “But its use in education has also raised an important question: how do we ensure it is used to support real learning, and doesn’t just offer solutions without helping students make sense of them?”
This concern is not theoretical. A growing body of research suggests that overreliance on AI may indeed be dampening cognitive engagement. One significant study by MIT’s Media Lab found that students who used AI to help them write essays exhibited markedly lower brain activity than those who relied on traditional search methods or their own intellectual resources. This neurological evidence has reinforced fears that AI may, if misused, undermine the development of critical faculties among young learners.
The trend is already well underway. According to recent data from the Pew Research Centre in the United States, more than 25 percent of teenagers aged 13 to 17 have used ChatGPT or similar AI tools for completing schoolwork. This figure is expected to rise as AI becomes more integrated into digital classrooms and remote learning platforms.
In the UK, Ofsted has issued its own caution. In a report released last month, the national schools inspectorate warned that “dependence on AI tools might hinder the development of pupils’ critical thinking and problem-solving skills if they are not used effectively.” The warning underscores the broader concern among educators that tools intended to assist students are increasingly becoming substitutes for cognitive effort.
The political response has been divided. The Labour Party, eyeing a modernized education system, has expressed support for AI-assisted teaching, including using generative models to design lesson plans and even automate certain aspects of assessment. But Conservative leaders have raised concerns that such dependence may “starve children of the ability to think critically” — a skillset increasingly valued in both higher education and the modern workplace.
At the heart of the debate lies a fundamental question: should AI serve as a substitute for human thinking or as a catalyst for deeper understanding? With “study mode,” OpenAI appears to have made its position clear. By reimagining ChatGPT not as an answer machine, but as a tutor that encourages inquiry and curiosity, the company aims to reposition its flagship product as a partner in learning rather than a shortcut.
As this new feature begins rolling out globally, educators, parents, and students alike will be watching closely. In a world where information is instantaneous, perhaps the true value of education will once again hinge on the ability not just to access knowledge, but to comprehend, analyze, and apply it — one thoughtful prompt at a time.
