Published: 18 February 2026. The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online.
The debate over net migration has returned to the centre of British politics following fresh academic findings. A new study suggests that efforts to train more domestic workers may not significantly reduce net migration levels. The research, produced by the University of Oxford’s Migration Observatory, questions whether stricter rules on employers will deliver the intended outcome. It finds that net migration is shaped by complex labour market forces rather than training supply alone. These findings arrive as ministers press ahead with reforms designed to reduce dependence on overseas recruitment.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer has argued that British businesses must invest more heavily in homegrown talent. He has pledged to reshape the immigration system so that employers prioritise local workers. Under the proposed framework, firms seeking overseas staff would need to demonstrate stronger commitments to domestic training. The policy aims to rebalance the labour market and address persistent skills shortages across key industries. Yet the Observatory’s briefing indicates that such measures may struggle to influence overall net migration in a lasting way.
The 13-page analysis highlights the limits of policy tools that rely solely on training incentives. Researchers warn that employers’ decisions are rarely driven by skills shortages alone. Low pay and demanding working conditions often deter local applicants from certain roles. In sectors such as social care and hospitality, recruitment challenges reflect structural issues beyond workforce qualifications. The study argues that without improvements in pay and job quality, businesses may still turn to migrant labour. In that context, domestic training schemes alone cannot guarantee a decline in net migration.
Data examined in the report show that work visas account for a relatively modest share of arrivals. Since the UK left the European Union, 3.45 million non-EU citizens have received visas and retained valid status. However, only 17 per cent were main applicants on work routes by the end of 2024. Many others entered as students, dependants, or refugees with permission to work. This broader pool of authorised workers means that tightening skilled work visas may have limited effect on net migration overall.
The researchers also stress that labour demand is not static. Economic cycles, technological change, and demographic shifts constantly reshape employment needs. During the pandemic, vacancies fell sharply before rebounding as restrictions lifted. Even if Britain trains more engineers or technicians, demand for those skills could expand simultaneously. In that scenario, higher domestic supply might be matched by higher employer demand, leaving shortages unresolved. As a result, net migration could remain elevated despite expanded training pipelines.
Ben Brindle, a co-author of the study, notes that the immigration system interacts with wider economic realities. Migrants who arrive on family or student visas often enter the workforce legally. Employers may recruit from this group without engaging the formal skilled visa process. Consequently, measures aimed narrowly at employer sponsorship rules address only one segment of the labour market. This dynamic further complicates efforts to reduce net migration through targeted training requirements.
The government maintains that its broader reforms are beginning to deliver results. Officials report that visa grants to main work applicants fell by 27 per cent in the year to September 2025. They also highlight that overall migration flows have declined compared with previous peaks. A spokesperson for the Home Office said that net migration is now at its lowest level in five years. Ministers attribute this trend to tighter eligibility rules and increased scrutiny of sponsorship arrangements.
New policies have already reshaped certain sectors. Overseas recruitment for care workers ended in 2025, while middle-skilled occupations such as butchers and chefs lost visa access. Employers in engineering, information technology, and telecommunications will soon need approved workforce plans. These documents must outline commitments to domestic skills development before overseas recruitment proceeds. The government argues that this integrated approach will strengthen the local workforce over time.
Yet the Observatory’s findings caution against expecting rapid or dramatic shifts. Creating effective incentives for training through immigration rules presents administrative challenges. A sector-based system could encourage some employers to rely on others’ investments. An individual monitoring model would require complex oversight mechanisms. Significant gaps in data further limit policymakers’ understanding of migration’s impact on Britain’s skills base. Without clearer evidence, designing precise interventions becomes more difficult.
The report also explores how migrant decision-making shapes net migration independently of employer demand. Many international students choose the UK for its universities and then seek employment after graduation. Family reunification routes enable relatives to join settled migrants, often with work rights. Refugees granted protection may also enter the labour market. These diverse pathways contribute to net migration figures beyond the scope of employer sponsorship reforms.
For businesses, the immediate concern remains operational continuity. Health and social care providers warn of staffing pressures if overseas hiring contracts abruptly. Construction firms face cyclical labour shortages tied to housing demand and infrastructure projects. Hospitality employers cite ongoing difficulties attracting applicants to irregular shifts and physically demanding roles. The study suggests that addressing these structural conditions may be as important as training initiatives.
Economists observing the debate emphasise that migration interacts with productivity and growth. Skilled migrants can fill urgent gaps and support innovation in expanding industries. At the same time, underinvestment in domestic training has long been criticised as a weakness of the British economy. Balancing these considerations requires nuanced policy design rather than single-measure solutions. The concept of net migration, while politically potent, captures only part of a complex economic picture.
Public opinion continues to influence the political landscape. Voters express concern about pressure on public services and housing availability. Ministers insist that reforms will ensure newcomers contribute fully to society. They frame their strategy as evidence-led and aligned with long-term economic resilience. Critics argue that focusing narrowly on headline figures risks overlooking deeper labour market reforms.
As the government prepares further announcements this summer, the question remains whether structural change can deliver measurable reductions. The Observatory does not dismiss the value of domestic training investment. Instead, it argues that expectations must remain realistic about its impact on migration totals. Broader economic forces, wage dynamics, and migrant choices will continue shaping outcomes. In that environment, net migration may prove resistant to quick policy fixes.
The study ultimately calls for improved data collection and transparent evaluation. Understanding how migration interacts with skills shortages requires detailed labour market analysis. Policymakers must assess both supply and demand factors with equal attention. Only then can reforms achieve lasting balance between opportunity and sustainability. The coming months will test whether current strategies can reconcile political promises with economic realities surrounding net migration.




























































































