Duterte Skips ICC Pre-Trial Hearing Over Philippine Drug War

Published: 23 February 2026 . The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online

Former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte has refused to attend the International Criminal Court (ICC) pre-trial hearing concerning alleged crimes committed during his controversial “war on drugs.” The hearing marks a significant step in the ongoing legal scrutiny of Duterte’s administration, which has faced international criticism for alleged human rights abuses.

Duterte, who led the Philippines from 2016 to 2022, has consistently rejected accusations that his policies encouraged extrajudicial killings or violated international law. In a statement released via his legal team, he described the ICC proceedings as “politically motivated” and vowed not to participate.

The ICC’s Office of the Prosecutor has been investigating claims that thousands of people were killed or unlawfully detained during Duterte’s aggressive anti-drug campaign. Prosecutors argue that these actions may constitute crimes against humanity, and the pre-trial stage is intended to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to proceed to a full trial.

Fatou Bensouda, former ICC Prosecutor, noted that pre-trial hearings are standard procedure: “This stage ensures that all evidence and arguments are carefully reviewed. Attendance by the accused is not mandatory, but participation can allow them to respond to allegations and present their side of the case.”

Human rights organizations have welcomed the hearing as a crucial step toward accountability. Karina Santos, spokesperson for the Philippine Human Rights Watch chapter, said: “The pre-trial hearing is a key opportunity to address the grievances of families affected by the drug war. Justice and transparency must be upheld regardless of political influence.”

The Philippine government has maintained that Duterte acted within the law and emphasized national sovereignty, arguing that domestic courts are best placed to handle issues related to internal policies. This position has led to tense relations with international bodies, including the ICC, over the limits of accountability and jurisdiction.

Legal experts predict that Duterte’s absence could complicate proceedings, but it does not halt the case. The pre-trial chamber will assess the evidence and determine whether formal charges should be issued. If the ICC decides to proceed, the case could be the first major trial concerning state-led anti-drug campaigns in Southeast Asia.

The hearing comes amid renewed debate in the Philippines about the legacy of Duterte’s administration, with public opinion divided. Supporters praise his hardline approach to crime, while critics argue that the campaign left a lasting mark on human rights and the rule of law.

As the ICC pre-trial proceedings unfold, the international community will be watching closely, balancing questions of justice, accountability, and the challenges of prosecuting former state leaders for policies implemented under their tenure.

Read More At>>