Neo-Nazi Scene Captured by Leo Regan in Milton Keynes Photograph

Published: 26 February 2026. The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online.

In 1990, photojournalist Leo Regan began capturing images that exposed the neo-Nazi music scene in Britain. His work documented bands like Skrewdriver and the Blood and Honour movement, which were gaining traction across the country at the time. Initially intended as a magazine feature, Regan’s project expanded into a two-year investigation, culminating in the book Public Enemies and a documentary exploring this controversial subculture. The project confronted ethical dilemmas and personal danger, but his aim was to photograph without promoting or condoning extremist ideology.

Regan explained that he approached the skinhead communities with honesty, making it clear that he disagreed with their politics yet had no hidden agenda. This openness earned him cautious acceptance, allowing him access to events and private spaces that most journalists could never enter. Working with a Jewish publisher and editor on the resulting book, Regan faced criticism from some quarters questioning his decision to document such extreme behaviour. He maintained that art exists to explore discomforting realities and that the camera offers a unique privilege to witness lives directly, even when morally troubling.

The images he captured reveal both the symbolic extremism of the skinhead movement and the humanity behind its members, without softening the severity of their beliefs. Regan’s philosophy emphasised communication and connection, aiming to engage viewers in confronting a reality often hidden from public awareness. “I’m not trying to forgive or underplay the extremities,” he noted, highlighting the delicate balance between observation and condemnation in documentary work.

Regan recounted that entering these environments was immediately shocking, describing them as “venomous and hateful.” Riotous scenes were common, and fights frequently broke out among attendees, sometimes for amusement rather than ideology. While he occasionally sustained minor injuries, his strategy was to remain alert and keep a low profile. This cautious approach allowed him to capture authentic moments without becoming part of the conflict.

One of his most notable photographs shows two skinheads counting the takings from a neo-Nazi gig in Milton Keynes, a scene that encapsulates both the absurdity and danger of the movement. The gig took place in a school hall rented under the pretext of a 21st birthday party, shocking the local residents who had no idea what was occurring inside. Authorities were notified, and police surrounded the building, yet the event was permitted to continue to avoid potential disorder spilling onto the streets.

Inside the hall, chaos reigned as fights erupted between factions and some attendees simply sought entertainment through aggression. At one point, the skinheads in Regan’s photograph sought refuge from the turmoil, deciding to count their earnings in his car. “Right, Leo, we’re using your car to count up,” they told him, and Regan seized the opportunity to document the scene. Even amidst such extremity, the photograph captures the ordinary human activity of money counting, juxtaposed with the violence and ideology surrounding it.

The tension of that night highlights the paradox of documenting extremism: seemingly mundane moments occur alongside threatening behaviours. Following this period, all gig attendees were escorted to the nearest train station by police to remove them from the neighbourhood safely. For Regan, these experiences underscored the constant danger and unpredictability inherent in chronicling radical movements. He eventually recognised the personal risk of prolonged engagement, particularly as he attracted the attention of police and left-wing activists, and as some associates became involved with the far-right Combat 18 network.

Combat 18, known for its violent and extremist actions, represented an even more perilous faction within the movement, amplifying Regan’s concerns about safety. Some individuals he had photographed later received life sentences, while others renounced the ideology or disappeared from the scene. Despite these hazards, Regan affirmed that his documentation was justified, noting the importance of capturing history as it unfolded, regardless of the personal or ethical risks involved.

Reflecting on the work, Regan admitted that the intensity of the neo-Nazi subculture was overwhelming. He described moments where the environment felt entirely unpredictable, yet the camera provided a buffer, allowing him to engage without fully immersing himself in the hostility. He emphasised that his goal was not sensationalism but careful observation, providing a record of a culture that was growing in visibility yet rarely scrutinised in depth.

The photograph of the skinheads counting their takings remains emblematic of Regan’s broader mission: to reveal the everyday realities behind extreme ideologies. It communicates the ordinariness embedded within extraordinary extremism, challenging viewers to confront the complexities of human behaviour within radical communities. This approach, balancing proximity and critique, distinguishes Regan’s work from sensationalist reporting, offering nuanced insight into a troubling chapter of British cultural history.

Ultimately, Regan’s documentation serves as both a historical record and a cautionary tale, illustrating how radical movements operate beneath the surface of society. By embedding himself within the scene, he was able to photograph moments that would otherwise remain unseen, combining courage with ethical consideration. His images continue to resonate as a reminder of the human capacity for both attachment and aggression, and the responsibility of those who witness it to bear careful testimony.

Through his lens, the skinhead movement is neither glorified nor dismissed. Instead, it is presented with clarity and honesty, allowing viewers to engage with uncomfortable truths about ideology, violence, and social dynamics. The photograph of two men counting their earnings is more than a snapshot; it is a window into a world defined by extremity, tension, and the human instinct for control and survival.

Regan’s work, culminating in Public Enemies, demonstrates the delicate interplay between ethical responsibility and artistic curiosity. By choosing to document without judgment yet with moral awareness, he created a record that challenges audiences while preserving the integrity of the moments captured. His photographs remind viewers that confronting difficult realities requires both bravery and empathy, and that visual storytelling can illuminate aspects of society that are often ignored or misunderstood.

In revisiting these images today, it becomes clear that historical documentation of extremist movements serves a vital role in public understanding. They offer insight into the motivations, contradictions, and humanity of individuals involved, and provide an invaluable resource for scholars, journalists, and citizens seeking to comprehend complex social phenomena. Regan’s commitment to observation and honesty ensures that these photographs maintain relevance, fostering reflection on how society addresses extremism and engages with its consequences.

The photograph of the skinheads counting the takings stands as a testament to Regan’s courage and skill, capturing the tension between ordinary life and radical ideology. It continues to provoke thought, offering a lens into a world that is at once distant and familiar, frightening and compelling. As a piece of historical evidence, it exemplifies the power of photography to reveal difficult truths, while maintaining the ethical integrity necessary to document without exploitation.

Through careful immersion and acute observation, Leo Regan’s images remain a powerful reminder of the responsibility inherent in documenting extremism. His work preserves not only a record of events but also the human stories behind them, illustrating the complexities of engagement, ideology, and moral judgement. The photograph of two skinheads counting money is an enduring symbol of the interplay between normality and extremity, demonstrating the potential of visual storytelling to illuminate society’s darker corners.

Check our latest news