FBI won’t cooperate on Alex Pretti investigation, state officials say

Published: 17 February 2026. The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online

State officials have confirmed that the FBI will not be cooperating with local authorities in the ongoing investigation into Alex Pretti, the controversial figure whose alleged activities have drawn national attention. The decision has sparked concern among local law enforcement and prompted questions about the jurisdictional limits of federal agencies in high-profile investigations.

According to state officials, repeated requests for assistance from the FBI have been declined, citing procedural and policy constraints. Local authorities say the lack of federal support complicates efforts to gather evidence, interview witnesses, and coordinate prosecutions. “We are committed to pursuing justice and conducting a thorough investigation,” said a state spokesperson, “but the absence of federal cooperation creates significant challenges in accessing resources and expertise typically available in cases of this nature.”

The investigation into Alex Pretti has been ongoing for several months, with allegations ranging from financial misconduct to breaches of state law. Authorities have been gathering evidence through subpoenas, interviews, and forensic analysis, but officials say certain aspects of the case—particularly those involving digital records and cross-state communications—would normally benefit from FBI involvement.

Critics argue that the FBI’s decision not to cooperate undermines public confidence in law enforcement coordination, particularly in high-profile cases with national implications. Legal analysts note that while federal agencies are not obligated to assist state investigations, collaboration is often crucial for efficiently resolving complex cases.

State officials have indicated that they will continue the investigation independently, leveraging available state resources, local police departments, and investigative units. They also emphasised that legal avenues remain open to request information or compel cooperation under certain circumstances, though these measures can be time-consuming and uncertain.

The situation has prompted debate over the boundaries between federal and state authority, highlighting challenges in cases where crimes or allegations span multiple jurisdictions. Observers note that tension between local prosecutors and federal agencies is not uncommon, particularly when cases involve high-profile individuals or politically sensitive issues.

Meanwhile, the public and media have closely followed developments in the Pretti case, with pressure mounting for transparency and progress. Advocacy groups have called for clarity regarding the FBI’s rationale for non-cooperation, urging federal authorities to explain how their decision aligns with broader law enforcement priorities.

State officials maintain that despite the lack of federal involvement, they are committed to a thorough investigation and ensuring that all legal procedures are properly followed. “We remain resolute in pursuing justice for all parties affected and will exhaust all available means to hold those responsible accountable,” a spokesperson said.

As the investigation continues, legal experts anticipate that questions about federal cooperation and jurisdictional authority may become central to public discourse. The case underscores the challenges faced by local law enforcement when federal resources are unavailable and highlights the delicate balance between state sovereignty and federal oversight in the American legal system.

Read More At>>