Published: 18 February 2026. The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online
UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves is resisting growing pressure from military leaders and parts of the government to agree to a substantial and immediate boost in defence spending, as debates intensify over how to fund the nation’s armed forces amid rising security challenges. The report says Reeves is sticking firmly to strict Treasury fiscal rules, frustrating defence chiefs and some in Downing Street who argue that current budgetary constraints are hurting the UK’s ability to modernise and prepare for future threats.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has publicly signalled that Britain “needs to go faster” on increasing defence expenditure, including discussions about raising total defence outlays towards 3 per cent of gross domestic product — a level NATO allies regard as a strong commitment to collective security — potentially by the end of the next parliament. However, officials face a growing fiscal gap in the Ministry of Defence budget, projected to be as much as £28 billion over the next decade, prompting urgent calls for a funding strategy.
Reeves has emphasised she will not relax the government’s self‑imposed borrowing rules — regarded within Whitehall as critical to maintaining investor confidence and controlling long‑term interest costs — even if that means defence spending increases only gradually or through reprioritisation within existing budgets. This stance has drawn criticism from some defence figures and MPs who say urgent threats require a more immediate and substantial uplift in military investment.
The chancellor’s position reflects broader tensions within government over how to balance fiscal prudence with strategic security commitments. While Reeves has previously overseen increases to defence funding — including a multi‑billion‑pound uplift in the Spring Statement 2025 and moves towards planned targets of 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2027 — critics argue that these steps are insufficient in the face of evolving geopolitical risks.
In recent days, investors and financial analysts have also voiced concerns about potential proposals to ease fiscal rules specifically to pay for defence spending, warning that such a move could trigger higher borrowing costs and unsettle bond markets, which already face the highest gilt yields among the G7. Supporters of tighter fiscal controls say Reeves’s caution is necessary to protect the UK economy’s health, even as security demands grow.
Reeves’s refusal to green‑light a large, immediate defence spending boost appears to be creating a political rift within the governing Labour Party and between the government and the armed forces. Some MPs from all parties have publicly urged quicker action on defence funding, arguing that rising threats — from Russia’s ongoing war in Ukraine to tensions in the Indo‑Pacific — necessitate robust and timely investment in capabilities ranging from conventional forces to cutting‑edge technologies.
Downing Street has so far sought to strike a careful balance, reiterating Starmer’s view that the UK must uphold its commitments to NATO and global security while managing public finances responsibly. As pressures mount, the government is expected to outline more detailed plans for defence investment later this spring, with ongoing debates about how to pay for accelerated spending likely to shape fiscal policy ahead of the next general election.




















































































