Published: 20 February 2026. The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online
Newly released Jeffrey Epstein files have revealed disturbing insights into the late financier’s activities, including evidence suggesting he once considered investing in a major record label as a way to gain access to women, according to emails included in the trove of documents made public this year by the US Department of Justice. The disclosures come as researchers, journalists and advocacy groups continue to delve into the millions of pages of material that have been released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act — a law that compelled authorities to open up long‑withheld records related to Epstein’s criminal network and controversial connections.
Among the material is correspondence with Epstein’s associate David Stern, a London‑based businessman, in which Epstein discusses a potential investment in EMI Records, a then‑major music company. Stern reportedly described the music industry as “related to P,” a term Epstein appears to have used in his communications to refer to women, and suggested that a record‑label deal could provide proximity to them. Epstein expressed interest in the idea and even floated involving prominent industry figures in the potential acquisition, though the deal ultimately never materialised.
Experts and critics say the revelations shed light on the pattern of Epstein’s efforts to intertwine social access, influence and personal desires through business ventures, underscoring how he used his wealth and network not just for financial gain but also to reinforce access to wealthy, connected circles and young women. While discussions about business deals and investments are not unusual in private correspondence, the context of Epstein’s documented criminal history — including his decades‑long sex trafficking and exploitation of minors — adds a deeply troubling dimension to these negotiations.
The EMI investment idea was apparently discussed in the early 2010s when the record company was struggling financially. Stern’s emails noted that despite its troubles, the industry’s association with women could benefit Epstein, according to the released messages. Epstein even mentioned possible involvement by former Sony Music executive Tommy Mottola to handle the venture. The emails, though redacted in parts for privacy and legal reasons, paint a picture of how Epstein and his circle explored opportunities that merged business interests with his social objectives.
EMI ultimately did not become an Epstein‑linked purchase; its assets were later absorbed into other major music companies following restructuring and acquisition by global media firms. Industry analysts say that a high‑profile figure like Epstein trying to enter the entertainment business raised eyebrows even at the time. Now, in the light of the file releases, those discussions are being re‑examined for what they suggest about his wider intentions and networks.
The broader release of Epstein documents has already led to scrutiny of numerous powerful figures and institutions, prompting resignations, denials and reputational debates. As more material is sifted through, researchers say the public interest and journalistic investigation into how Epstein leveraged social, political and commercial ties will continue.




























































































