Published: 24 February 2026
The English Chronicle Desk
The English Chronicle Online
Global trade experienced fresh turmoil this week as U.S. President Donald Trump’s scramble to salvage his embattled tariff policy sparked widespread economic confusion and diplomatic strain. The upheaval follows a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that struck down much of Trump’s sweeping global tariffs imposed under emergency powers, a decision that authorities and businesses around the world say has upended trade agreements and unsettled markets.
In late 2025, Trump’s administration had deployed broad import duties under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, applying levies on goods from scores of trading partners in a bid to shrink the U.S. trade deficit and pressure foreign producers. The Supreme Court on 20 February ruled that this law did not authorize such tariffs in peacetime, a rebuke that has sent shockwaves through global policy circles.
Rather than abandon the levies, Trump immediately announced a new 15 percent global import tariff under a different statute, designed to take effect temporarily for 150 days while alternative legal avenues are explored. The abrupt shift has left diplomats and business leaders struggling to interpret the U.S. trade stance and its implications for existing and future agreements.
Market responses to the policy reversal have been sharp. Stock futures in the United States and Europe fell as investors rotated into safe‑haven assets like gold and silver, reflecting uncertainty about future trade flows and corporate cost pressures. Many analysts described the situation as “pure tariff chaos,” noting that nations previously granted tariff agreements by Washington now face unclear legal status and unpredictable duties.
Europe has been particularly vocal in its criticism. The European Commission has demanded clarity from Washington, urging the United States to honour previously negotiated tariff arrangements. Lawmakers in the European Parliament have even suggested pausing the ratification of a major EU‑U.S. trade deal until the tariff regime is legally settled, highlighting how unresolved U.S. policy is exerting diplomatic costs.
Asian economies are also grappling with the fallout. Export‑dependent nations such as Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and India have expressed concern about how the shifting U.S. tariffs will affect their competitiveness in American markets, supply chain planning and investment decisions. Uncertainty over implementation details and potential future levies has created confusion for businesses trying to price goods and navigate cross‑border deals.
Critics argue that the chaotic tariff policy is damaging the United States’ credibility as a trade partner and contributing to broader global economic instability. Legal challenges, subsequent adjustments and diplomatic protests could prolong uncertainty well into 2026, complicating efforts by companies and governments to plan ahead.



























































































