Published: 07 January 2026. The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online.
The Trump administration has intensified its Minnesota immigration surge, sending more agents across the state. This latest immigration surge marks the largest deployment of federal agents in Minnesota history, according to officials, targeting individuals suspected of fraud or undocumented status. Local communities have expressed growing concern, warning that the immigration surge is causing fear among residents, including legal citizens, as authorities increase enforcement efforts. Minnesota’s governor criticized the surge, calling it a disproportionate attack on the state and its immigrant populations.
Federal authorities confirmed that this immigration surge is part of Operation Metro Surge, which began in early December, aiming to investigate social service fraud and apprehend undocumented residents. Officials from the Department of Homeland Security emphasized the immigration surge would involve both ICE and Homeland Security Investigations officers. Reports indicate the operation is designed to identify individuals engaged in criminal activity while also reviewing cases of fraud.
Todd Lyons, acting director of ICE, described the ongoing immigration surge in Minneapolis as the “largest operation ever,” highlighting the agency’s commitment to targeting criminal illegal aliens. DHS communications show videos of arrests in Minneapolis, including one man from Ecuador wanted for serious crimes in his home country. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was also present during these operations, underscoring the administration’s focus on Minnesota.
Community leaders have expressed strong opposition to the immigration surge, noting that many immigrants are avoiding public spaces for fear of arrest. Local protests have arisen in response to the federal enforcement actions, with residents challenging ICE’s authority to conduct door-to-door visits at companies suspected of employing undocumented workers. Critics argue that the immigration surge unfairly targets Minnesota’s large Somali population, most of whom are US citizens.
Governor Tim Walz condemned the action, calling it a “war being waged against Minnesota” and denouncing what he described as a petty and vindictive federal approach. He emphasized the negative impact on families and local businesses, warning that the state faces unprecedented federal pressure. Meanwhile, ICE officials insist that the operation targets only criminal offenders and those involved in social service fraud, despite growing public backlash.
Legal experts and immigrant advocacy groups have raised concerns over federal operations, arguing that they may violate due process rights and increase fear among law-abiding residents. The operation highlights ongoing tensions between federal immigration authorities and sanctuary policies in Minnesota. Residents report that these actions have altered daily routines, with many avoiding grocery stores, medical appointments, and community events to evade possible federal encounters.
This latest operation has reignited debates over federal enforcement priorities, particularly regarding the focus on fraud cases and undocumented populations. Analysts suggest that Minnesota’s Somali community may face heightened scrutiny due to political narratives surrounding recent social service fraud allegations. DHS officials, however, maintain that the actions are part of a lawful, targeted effort to address criminal activity and social services abuse.
The Trump administration’s Minnesota immigration surge appears set to continue, with authorities maintaining a strong presence across the state. While federal agencies argue the surge is essential for law enforcement, local residents, leaders, and advocacy organizations emphasize its disruptive and intimidating effects. The ongoing tension underscores broader national debates over immigration enforcement, sanctuary policies, and the balance between public safety and civil liberties.
As Minnesota navigates the impact of federal operations, community members are calling for dialogue and legal safeguards to protect residents. While ICE and DHS highlight the necessity of their actions, critics warn that these measures risk deepening fear and mistrust within Minnesota’s diverse communities. Observers suggest that the state’s political, legal, and social landscapes may be permanently affected by the sustained federal presence.
The immigration surge in Minnesota reflects a continuing national pattern of aggressive federal enforcement, particularly in regions with high immigrant populations. As the situation unfolds, residents, policymakers, and advocacy groups will closely monitor the effects of the immigration surge, debating both its legality and social consequences. Federal officials maintain their commitment to targeting criminal illegal aliens and fraud cases, but local leaders argue that the immigration surge disproportionately affects communities with deep-rooted immigrant populations.



























































































