UK Disposable Income Rises Faster in Eleven Towns

Published: 26 January 2026. The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online.

Across the past decade, UK disposable income has quietly reshaped the fortunes of several towns and cities. New analysis shows that eleven urban areas have recorded growth at twice the national pace. This pattern reveals how targeted economic strategies can lift household finances even during prolonged national pressures. The findings, drawn from extensive research and verified data, offer lessons for policymakers and communities alike.

Between 2013 and 2023, residents in the strongest performing towns and cities saw average disposable income growth of 5.2 percent. Across urban Britain as a whole, growth stood at just 2.4 percent during the same period. This widening gap underlines how local economic decisions influence daily living standards. It also highlights why UK disposable income varies sharply between places sharing similar national conditions.

The study, produced by the Centre for Cities thinktank, examined 63 of the country’s largest towns and cities. It found that if all had matched the growth rate achieved by the top eleven, average households would have been £3,200 better off. Over a decade marked by economic shocks, that additional income could have significantly changed family security. The figures illustrate how growth strategies matter as much as national fiscal policy.

Warrington, Barnsley and Wakefield emerged among the strongest performers. Each has pursued a deliberate approach to economic development, centred on attracting productive firms and skilled employment. These towns invested in sectors able to trade beyond local boundaries, including software, logistics, marketing and financial services. Such industries bring higher wages and resilience, strengthening UK disposable income for residents.

Andrew Carter, chief executive of Centre for Cities, argued that the results challenge short-term cost of living interventions. Measures such as capped transport fares or temporary energy support can help households briefly. However, they do not address the root causes of stagnant incomes. Carter stressed that sustained economic growth remains the most reliable way to improve UK disposable income across communities.

Barnsley provides a clear illustration of this approach. The town leveraged its location along the M1 corridor to develop a growing logistics hub. Local authorities released industrial land around motorway junctions, encouraging private investment and job creation. Since 2015, Barnsley has added around 6,000 private service jobs, with a significant share classed as high skilled. These roles have contributed to a 5.6 percent rise in disposable income over the decade.

Warrington has followed a similarly assertive strategy. The Cheshire town recorded disposable income growth of 5.3 percent between 2013 and 2023. Its broader economic expansion was even more striking, reaching 41 percent, the highest among all locations studied. Workplace wages in Warrington now exceed the national average, making it unique among northern English cities. These gains have strengthened UK disposable income locally despite wider regional disparities.

Brighton topped the ranking, recording an 8.1 percent increase in disposable income. Worthing followed closely with growth of 7.8 percent, while London saw a rise of 5.8 percent. These results challenge assumptions that only the capital benefits from high-paying sectors. Instead, they show that well-connected coastal and regional cities can compete successfully when they nurture innovation and skills.

The top eleven locations also outperformed national averages for economic growth. While urban Britain recorded average growth of 18.4 percent, these towns and cities achieved an increase of 27 percent. This connection between output growth and household income reinforces the argument that productivity drives prosperity. It further explains why UK disposable income has diverged across the country.

In contrast, several cities struggled to improve living standards over the same period. Cambridge, despite its global reputation for innovation, experienced a real-terms decline in disposable income of 3 percent since 2013. High housing costs played a central role, with residents spending around 17 percent of their outgoings on accommodation. The report estimated that Cambridge households would have gained £10,900 more over the decade if growth had matched the top performers.

These contrasts reveal how success depends not only on economic output, but also on affordability and infrastructure. Cities with strong job creation but limited housing supply often see income gains eroded by living costs. By contrast, towns that expanded housing alongside employment have protected household finances. This balance has proved crucial in sustaining UK disposable income growth.

The report also highlighted the importance of skills development and transport investment. Many successful towns paired business growth with training programmes, helping residents access new opportunities. Improved public transport connected workers to expanding employment zones, reducing barriers to participation. These policies ensured that economic gains translated into higher take-home pay for local people.

Carter noted that political courage often underpinned these decisions. In Warrington, authorities supported the expansion of edge-of-town business parks and released green belt land for housing. Such moves can provoke local opposition, yet they delivered long-term benefits. Carter argued that leadership requires willingness to act on evidence, even when choices are unpopular.

The findings arrive at a critical moment for national debate. With living costs still weighing heavily on households, pressure is mounting for immediate relief. However, the evidence suggests that enduring improvements depend on growth-focused strategies. By prioritising productive sectors, skills and housing supply, towns can raise UK disposable income sustainably.

For central government, the message is equally clear. National policies should empower local leaders to pursue tailored growth plans. Devolution of powers over planning, transport and skills could help replicate success elsewhere. Without such alignment, regional inequalities in UK disposable income are likely to persist.

Ultimately, the experience of these eleven towns and cities shows that prosperity is not predetermined by geography alone. Strategic choices, sustained investment and political resolve can reshape economic outcomes. As Britain considers its next phase of development, these lessons offer a roadmap for lifting living standards nationwide.

Check our latest news