Published: 30 December 2025. The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online.
More than six years after Unai Emery departed north London, his presence continues haunting Arsenal’s ambitions. Each meeting between Aston Villa and Arsenal now carries an edge shaped by history, regret, and unresolved rivalry. Emery may insist there is no personal motivation when facing his former club, yet recent encounters suggest his Villa side consistently disrupt Mikel Arteta’s plans at crucial moments.
The sense of inevitability began to form in December 2023, when Villa ended a four-match losing streak against Arsenal with a narrow home victory. That result appeared routine at the time, but it marked a turning point. From that moment onward, Arsenal have struggled to impose authority over Emery’s disciplined, tactically astute team. The pattern repeated itself months later when Villa stunned the Emirates with a decisive 2–0 win, a result that ultimately derailed Arsenal’s title challenge.
Manchester City, relentless and unforgiving, capitalised fully on that stumble. Winning their final eight matches, City reclaimed the crown while Arsenal were left reflecting on missed opportunities. The damage went beyond dropped points. Confidence visibly drained, replaced by a familiar anxiety that has followed Arsenal through consecutive runner-up finishes.
Although Arsenal began the following season brightly with a commanding victory at Villa Park, old habits resurfaced. Villa’s dramatic comeback from two goals down to draw in January symbolised Arsenal’s inability to maintain control under pressure. That draw, arriving during a crucial phase, encapsulated a season where Liverpool slipped away but Arsenal failed to seize the opening.
For Arteta and supporters alike, the realisation has grown uncomfortable yet undeniable. Aston Villa, under Emery’s meticulous guidance, have become a recurring obstacle. The Spaniard’s brief Arsenal tenure between 2018 and 2019 ended prematurely, yet his imprint on English football has only strengthened since. At Villa Park, he has built a side defined by resilience, structure, and belief.
That belief was evident in Villa’s dramatic late victory over Arsenal earlier this winter. Snatching a 2–1 win with relentless pressure and intelligent substitutions, Villa reinforced their status as a genuine force. Emery’s post-match composure contrasted sharply with the visible frustration etched across Arteta’s face.
Arteta, however, remains a manager shaped by detail and persistence. The challenge of dismantling a team on an eleven-match winning streak across competitions is one he embraces. Arsenal’s immediate response to defeat has been encouraging on paper, recording five successive victories. Yet beneath the surface, concerns linger about performances lacking fluency and conviction.
Goals have arrived in unexpected ways. Own goals have inflated tallies, masking attacking inefficiencies. Injuries have further complicated selection decisions, forcing players into unfamiliar roles. Declan Rice’s deployment at right-back, while effective defensively, highlights the strain placed on squad depth. The absence of key figures has disrupted rhythm and confidence.
Gabriel Magalhães’ return offers timely reassurance. His presence stabilises the defence and restores leadership. Arteta hopes his recovery will reduce reliance on reactive defending, particularly during late match phases. Riccardo Calafiori’s fitness remains uncertain, while Jurriën Timber’s absence continues stretching resources.
The Emirates atmosphere has reflected these tensions. Even during controlled performances, nerves ripple through the stands when opposition momentum builds. Against Brighton, a late goal shifted the mood instantly. Arteta interpreted the reaction positively, framing it as hunger rather than fear. Yet repeated collapses in previous seasons make supporters understandably cautious.
Arteta’s words following that match revealed his mindset. He emphasised composure, ambition, and the need to finish contests decisively. Missed chances, he admitted, prolong suffering. Arsenal’s inability to kill games has haunted recent campaigns, costing valuable points and momentum.
Statistics underline the concern. Dropping twenty-one points from winning positions last season remains a painful memory. This campaign has avoided similar extremes, but warning signs persist. Arsenal’s leading scorer in the league, Viktor Gyökeres, has just five goals. While crucial, that return highlights the lack of a consistent attacking focal point.
Support has come from Bukayo Saka, Leandro Trossard, and Eberechi Eze, each contributing steadily but without dominance. The impending return of Kai Havertz promises creativity and movement, while Gabriel Jesus’ recovery adds depth. Arteta hopes their availability will restore balance and unpredictability.
Set pieces remain Arsenal’s most reliable weapon. Gabriel’s aerial strength enhances threat, yet overreliance limits spontaneity. Against Villa, whose defensive organisation is among the league’s strongest, such predictability carries risk. Emery’s teams thrive on neutralising strengths before exploiting moments of transition.
Villa’s consistency has been striking. Nine consecutive league victories by a single-goal margin demonstrate control rather than fortune. Emery’s philosophy prioritises game management, patience, and ruthless efficiency. Arsenal, conversely, often seek dominance through possession, leaving space vulnerable during transitions.
With Manchester City idle until New Year’s Day, Arsenal view their upcoming fixture as decisive. Victory would maintain pressure and preserve belief. Defeat would deepen doubts heading into a challenging run featuring Liverpool, Bournemouth, and a daunting trip to the Etihad.
The looming schedule underscores why this moment feels pivotal. Arsenal’s inability to conquer Villa has shifted psychological balance. Emery’s calm assurance contrasts with Arteta’s visible urgency, reflecting their respective journeys since leaving Arsenal.
Arteta recently marked six years in charge, a tenure defined by progress yet unfulfilled promise. The FA Cup triumph during his first season remains his sole major honour. Successive near misses have tested patience, both internally and externally. He acknowledges that legacy depends on converting promise into silverware.
Defeating Villa would represent more than three points. It would symbolise growth, resilience, and evolution. Overcoming Emery’s tactical mastery could reaffirm Arsenal’s readiness to challenge consistently at the highest level. Failure, however, would reinforce a narrative of fragility against elite opposition.
As 2025 closes, Arsenal appear poised yet uncertain. They are likely to finish top unless catastrophe strikes, but expectations extend beyond league position. Supporters crave conviction, authority, and belief restored.
For Arteta, 2026 looms as a defining year. Ending the long wait for a league title would elevate his project from promise to legacy. Removing Aston Villa as a recurring obstacle stands as a crucial step on that path. The rivalry, shaped by shared history and contrasting philosophies, now carries consequences far beyond nostalgia.


























































































