Le Pen appeal starts in embezzlement trial ahead of 2027 election

Published: 13 January 2026. The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online.

The Le Pen appeal over her embezzlement conviction begins this week, drawing international attention. The French far-right leader faces scrutiny for allegedly diverting European parliament funds, a case that could prevent her from contesting the 2027 presidential election. Le Pen, 57, heads the National Rally and has consistently denied wrongdoing, insisting she remains committed to leading France despite the legal challenge. This high-profile Le Pen appeal comes after her 2025 conviction barred her from office, igniting debates across France and abroad about justice, politics, and the future of the National Rally.

The legal case revolves around Le Pen’s alleged orchestration of a scheme from 2004 to 2016. European funds meant for parliamentary assistants were reportedly redirected to pay party employees in France, unrelated to European parliamentary work. The total loss is estimated at €4.8 million (£4.2m), which critics say highlights a systemic abuse of taxpayer money. Le Pen’s conviction last year led to a five-year ban from holding office, alongside a four-year prison sentence, partially suspended, and a €100,000 fine.

Her Le Pen appeal is joined by ten other party members previously convicted, and the trial is scheduled to continue until 12 February. The final verdict, expected before summer, will directly influence whether Le Pen can mount a fourth presidential campaign next year. Should she remain ineligible, her party has suggested her protégé, Jordan Bardella, 30, would assume candidacy, having already gained popularity among voters. Recent polls suggest Bardella enjoys strong support, with nearly half of French respondents viewing him as the most likely winner in 2027.

Political analysts caution that the broader election landscape is still uncertain, with several contenders yet to declare. The outcome of the Le Pen appeal holds significance not only for Le Pen herself but also for the National Rally’s strategic positioning. Le Pen maintains she remains a viable candidate, describing the judicial process as a form of political persecution she must navigate. In interviews, she has expressed that even if barred, Bardella could effectively carry forward the party’s agenda, underscoring her influence over National Rally’s direction.

Le Pen’s conviction drew international attention, with figures such as former US President Donald Trump calling it a “witch-hunt” orchestrated by European leftists. Reports briefly suggested possible US discussions on sanctioning French judicial figures involved in the case, though the state department later denied any such action. French authorities reiterated that interference in domestic judicial matters would be unacceptable and stressed their commitment to legal independence.

The appeal raises questions about the potential length of any revised sentence. If a shorter ban from running for office is issued, Le Pen could theoretically return to politics in time for the 2027 election. Party officials have withheld candidate announcements until the Le Pen appeal concludes, leaving speculation about whether Le Pen will continue to lead the party into the presidential race.

Public discourse around the case remains intense, reflecting broader tensions in French society over political corruption and the influence of populist movements. Le Pen’s supporters argue that the conviction was politically motivated, while critics emphasize the scale of financial mismanagement and the need for accountability. Analysts also note that voter sentiment may shift significantly depending on the appeal outcome, influencing both presidential and parliamentary campaigns.

Legal observers highlight the meticulous investigation that uncovered the misappropriation of European funds, noting that the scheme involved multiple layers of administrative deception. The conviction signalled to many that even high-ranking political figures are subject to scrutiny, reinforcing principles of transparency and rule of law. Meanwhile, Le Pen’s narrative frames her as a determined political leader confronting what she perceives as systemic judicial bias, a message likely intended to resonate with her electorate.

The case has broader implications for European politics, demonstrating the intersection between national legal systems and European institutional oversight. The European Parliament continues to monitor the situation, ensuring that safeguards prevent misuse of public funds. Observers suggest that this trial may influence not only French electoral politics but also discussions on accountability mechanisms within European political institutions.

As proceedings advance, attention will remain on how Le Pen and her party navigate the appeal’s outcome. A verdict favoring a reduced sentence could restore her candidacy rights, potentially reshaping the dynamics of the 2027 election. Conversely, a reaffirmation of the existing ban would elevate Bardella as the party’s figurehead, testing his ability to consolidate support and continue Le Pen’s political legacy.

Marine Le Pen’s Le Pen appeal trial, with its significant legal and political stakes, continues to captivate national and international audiences. Whether she ultimately returns to presidential politics or passes the baton to Bardella, the case underscores the persistent tensions between legal accountability, political ambition, and public perception in modern French democracy. The unfolding developments will likely shape both the National Rally’s trajectory and broader electoral outcomes in the years leading up to 2027.

Check our latest news