Hate Laws: Labor Faces Federal Blockade as Negotiations Stall

Published: 15 January 2026. The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online.

Labor’s hate laws face mounting challenges as the Coalition and Greens rule out support, putting the proposed legislation at risk of failing in federal parliament. Designed to tackle rising antisemitism and Islamic extremism, these hate laws emerged following the Bondi terror attack, which left 15 people dead, and aim to provide urgent protections for vulnerable communities. Labor maintains negotiations continue, but securing bipartisan agreement remains difficult amid strong opposition from both sides of parliament.

The Coalition has made clear it will oppose the legislation, with Shadow Minister Sussan Ley calling it “pretty unsalvageable” and arguing that the proposed hate laws do not adequately target extremist propaganda or offensive antisemitic phrases. Despite appeals from the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) to pursue amendments rather than outright rejection, Ley remains unconvinced, highlighting the rushed drafting process and absence of crucial provisions.

The Greens have also expressed objections, stating that hate laws must protect all Australians equally and should not favour one group over another. Leader Larissa Waters emphasised that legislation must safeguard religious communities, LGBTQ+ individuals, and people with disabilities, while preserving protest rights, including for pro-Palestinian groups. Her stance signals the considerable difficulty Labor faces in achieving a Senate pathway without adjustments that satisfy all stakeholders.

Labor insists dialogue continues, with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese criticising the Coalition’s inconsistent position. Albanese noted that opposition members had previously called for parliament to reconvene, yet now oppose urgent hate laws. He stressed that negotiation and compromise are essential to secure protections for Australians affected by rising extremist threats.

The legislation would modernise counter-terrorism laws and codify antisemitism for the first time while empowering the Australian Federal Police and ASIO. It would also restrict extremists from entering Australia and remove citizenship from dual-national terrorists and hate preachers. Labor argues that these hate laws are vital in providing legal tools to prevent future attacks and safeguard communities across the nation.

Community leaders remain divided, highlighting tensions between the urgency of reform and careful legislative drafting. Peter Wertheim of the ECAJ warned that rejecting the bill outright would be a retrograde step, stressing the importance of immediate implementation even if the hate laws are imperfect. Former Labor adviser Dean Sherr echoed this, stressing that bipartisan cooperation is essential for public trust and credibility in protecting vulnerable communities.

Gun law reforms included in the legislation further complicate its passage, as some Nationals MPs oppose stricter firearm regulations, and backbenchers such as Andrew Hastie raise constitutional concerns. Labor maintains that last-minute amendments could help broaden protections for religious groups, LGBTQ+ Australians, and individuals with disabilities while reinforcing powers against extremists.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong criticised the Coalition for showing “weakness and hypocrisy,” arguing that urgent hate laws are necessary to address the growing threat of violent extremism and rising hate crimes. Albanese added that political obstruction could delay vital protections, underscoring the importance of enacting these laws without unnecessary partisan delays.

Parliament will sit next week on Monday and Tuesday, where the fate of Labor’s hate laws will likely be decided. Observers say the bill’s outcome illustrates the challenges of passing sensitive legislation in a fragmented political environment, balancing civil liberties with the need to protect communities from hate-driven violence.

Check our latest news