Published: 26 January 2026. The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online.
Labour’s internal conflict deepened on Sunday as Burnham blocked from standing in the Gorton and Denton byelection sparked immediate anger. MPs and union supporters criticised the decision, highlighting tensions under Keir Starmer’s leadership. The NEC argued that allowing Burnham to contest the seat would require a costly midterm mayoral election in Greater Manchester, diverting vital party resources. Critics warned that Burnham blocked risks weakening northern Labour support and giving Reform UK a strategic advantage ahead of upcoming contests.
The NEC’s officers’ group, including Starmer himself, voted overwhelmingly against Burnham’s candidacy. While the leadership cited concerns over instability, dissenting MPs described the decision as “petty factionalism” and “a huge mistake.” Union leaders echoed these warnings, with Unison’s Andrea Egan stating members would feel “disappointed and angry.” Many argue that Burnham blocked undermines party unity and disenfranchises local Labour members who wanted the choice of a strong candidate.
Burnham released a statement expressing his disappointment, criticising the NEC for restricting democratic selection. He warned that Burnham blocked could negatively affect Labour’s performance in the byelection and allow Reform UK to capitalise on internal disputes. Local party figures emphasised that excluding Burnham diminishes Labour’s chances in a historically favourable seat. Observers suggest the leadership prioritised preventing a potential leadership challenge over ensuring electoral success.
Several prominent MPs, including Louise Haigh, labelled the NEC’s ruling “incredibly disappointing,” arguing that Burnham should strengthen the national team rather than threaten it. Simon Opher called the move “petty factionalism,” stressing that voters deserve the opportunity to choose the best candidate. Senior figures such as Ed Miliband, Sadiq Khan, Lucy Powell, and Angela Rayner had urged Burnham be allowed to stand, but only Powell supported him in the NEC vote. Despite these endorsements, Burnham blocked effectively prevents his short-term return to parliament.
Starmer allies argue the decision preserves stability, avoiding an internal leadership coup during politically sensitive times. Polls suggest Labour faces vulnerability in the north-west, making leadership wary of internal divisions dominating the national conversation. Supporters contend that keeping Burnham as mayor ensures continuity and secures control over Greater Manchester, though critics warn this risks alienating key supporters.
The controversy demonstrates tensions between pragmatic governance and democratic principles. Labour insiders fear that sidelining Burnham undermines efforts to build a strong, unified front ahead of May elections. Analysts note that failure to include a prominent northern politician could weaken Labour’s appeal in key constituencies. The ruling underscores the delicate balance between internal discipline and electoral strategy, with Burnham blocked reflecting factional priorities over broader party unity.
Calls for reconsideration continue, as union leaders, MPs, and local activists monitor the impact. Burnham’s supporters argue allowing him to contest the seat could consolidate northern support and strengthen Labour against Reform UK. Party officials now face a challenging task balancing leadership stability, member satisfaction, and electoral competitiveness.
Ultimately, the outcome may define Labour’s northern strategy and wider political credibility. While leadership seeks to avoid internal crises, critics highlight the danger of disenfranchising popular figures like Burnham. Observers suggest Labour must weigh pragmatic governance against member democracy to ensure electoral success in May, while the Burnham blocked decision remains a focal point of controversy.



























































































