Published: 29 January 2026. The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online.
The Wigan lottery drugs case has stunned communities after a court heard how extraordinary wealth allegedly fuelled extraordinary crime. An 80-year-old National Lottery winner was convicted for helping build a vast counterfeit drug operation, prosecutors said, operating quietly from a rural home near Wigan. The revelations have shaken public confidence and renewed scrutiny of organised crime networks exploiting legitimate fortunes for illicit gain.
John Eric Spiby, once a modest pensioner, won £2.4 million on the National Lottery in 2010. According to the prosecution, the windfall did not bring retirement comfort. Instead, it allegedly helped underpin one of the largest counterfeit tablet operations ever uncovered in Britain. The Wigan lottery drugs investigation revealed millions of fake pills manufactured on an industrial scale, disguised as diazepam, and distributed widely across the region.
Diazepam, commonly known as Valium, is prescribed to calm the nervous system and treat anxiety disorders. Prosecutors said the counterfeit versions carried unknown risks, potentially endangering countless users. The court heard that the tablets were produced using specialist machinery, purchased and installed at Spiby’s countryside property. Despite its peaceful appearance, the home became a manufacturing hub within the Wigan lottery drugs conspiracy.
Manchester Crown Court was told that Spiby was not acting alone. He was joined by his son, John Colin Spiby, alongside Lee Drury and Callum Dorian. Police described the group as an organised crime gang capable of producing tablets in quantities usually associated with legitimate pharmaceutical factories. The judge later remarked that the scale was unprecedented in cases of this nature.
Investigators said Spiby provided premises, oversaw adaptations, and helped acquire machinery worth thousands of pounds. The operation allegedly ran with calculated efficiency, exploiting rural isolation to avoid suspicion. The Wigan lottery drugs enterprise, prosecutors claimed, was valued at up to £288 million in potential street sales, highlighting the enormous profits at stake.
Spiby denied any knowledge of the conspiracy throughout the trial. His defence argued that others were responsible for planning and execution, portraying him as an unwitting landlord. However, the jury rejected that account. After deliberation, Spiby was convicted of conspiracy to produce class C drugs and conspiracy to supply them. He was also found guilty of firearms offences and perverting the course of justice.
Sentencing was delivered with stark clarity. Judge Clarke KC told the court that Spiby continued a criminal lifestyle long after most would have retired peacefully. Despite the financial security of his lottery win, the judge said, Spiby remained deeply involved in serious criminality. The sentence of 16 years and six months reflected both the harm caused and the defendant’s senior role.
The Wigan lottery drugs case also exposed a disturbing intersection between drug production and weapons possession. Firearms and ammunition were discovered at Spiby’s property, raising fears about the potential for violence linked to the operation. Although the defence argued that the weapons were antique revolvers from the First World War era, the court found the possession unlawful and relevant to sentencing.
Co-defendants received substantial prison terms. John Colin Spiby, aged 37, was jailed for nine years. Lee Drury, 45, received nine years and nine months. Callum Dorian, identified by prosecutors as a principal organiser, had already been sentenced to 12 years in 2024. Together, their punishments underscored the seriousness of the criminal network.
During the trial, messages retrieved from encrypted group chats added colour to the prosecution’s case. One message attributed to Spiby boasted that “Elon and Jeff best watch their backs,” a comment interpreted as bravado reflecting the scale of profits. Such remarks, prosecutors argued, illustrated the mindset within the Wigan lottery drugs operation, where criminal ambition appeared boundless.
Emma Clarke, leading the prosecution, described the conspiracy as meticulously organised. She told the court that the counterfeit tablets were visually convincing and distributed widely. Had they reached full circulation, she said, the pills could have generated hundreds of millions of pounds. The public health implications were severe, given the unpredictable composition of counterfeit medication.
The judge repeatedly emphasised the unprecedented scale of production. He said evidence led him to conclude that this was the largest operation of its kind uncovered by British police. The contrast between the quiet rural setting and the industrial activity within was particularly striking. Neighbours described the area as peaceful, unaware of the criminal enterprise unfolding nearby.
Defence counsel Adam Kent KC argued that responsibility lay elsewhere. He maintained that Dorian, not Spiby, orchestrated the operation, directing others with authority. Kent cited Dorian’s own words, referring to the “millionaire” whose house was used, suggesting Spiby was peripheral. The jury, however, accepted the prosecution’s portrayal of Spiby as senior in both name and role.
Beyond the courtroom, the Wigan lottery drugs case has prompted wider debate about the misuse of wealth and trust. Lottery winners are often seen as symbols of luck and possibility. This case challenged that narrative, illustrating how sudden wealth can sometimes facilitate criminal ambition rather than alleviate it. Community leaders expressed sadness that a local success story ended in disgrace.
Law enforcement officials highlighted the importance of intelligence-led policing in dismantling such networks. They noted that counterfeit pharmaceuticals present unique dangers, as users cannot know dosage or ingredients. The operation’s discovery prevented potentially fatal harm, authorities said, and demonstrated the necessity of sustained investment in organised crime units.
The sentencing also sent a message to those who believe age confers immunity. The judge made clear that criminal responsibility does not diminish with years. In the Wigan lottery drugs case, advanced age was not a mitigating factor but a sobering reminder that serious crime can span a lifetime.
As the defendants begin lengthy prison terms, attention turns to the broader implications. The case has already influenced discussions around monitoring large-scale cash flows and unusual purchasing patterns linked to machinery and chemicals. Policymakers may now consider whether additional safeguards are needed to detect similar operations earlier.
For residents near Wigan, the revelations have been unsettling. The idea that a vast counterfeit drug factory operated quietly among fields and farms has altered perceptions of safety. While police reassured the public that the network was dismantled, the emotional impact lingers.
Ultimately, the Wigan lottery drugs case stands as a stark example of how ordinary settings can conceal extraordinary criminality. It underscores the persistent challenge posed by organised crime and the importance of vigilance, even when those involved appear unlikely suspects.



























































































