London Mayor Sadiq Khan has declared that his “ultimate goal” is to reverse Brexit, a statement likely to reignite political tensions over the UK’s relationship with the European Union. Speaking at a policy forum, Khan framed the issue as a long-term mission to restore the economic and cultural links he says have been damaged since the 2016 referendum.
In his remarks, Khan stressed the need to protect London’s global status, arguing that EU membership previously enabled the city to attract talent, investment, and international business. He suggested that while immediate political conditions make a reversal unlikely, building public support and influencing future governments is key to his strategy.
“Brexit has weakened our economy and diminished London’s influence,” Khan said. “My ultimate goal is to reverse Brexit, restore our connections with Europe, and ensure that London remains a leading global city.”
He emphasized that this is a long-term ambition rather than an immediate political action, signalling that his position is aimed at shaping debate and preparing for possible future scenarios.
Khan’s comments have provoked swift reactions across the political spectrum. Conservative figures criticised the mayor for appearing to challenge the democratic outcome of the 2016 referendum.
Jacob Rees-Mogg, former Brexit minister, described Khan’s position as “undemocratic and divisive,” warning that such rhetoric risks alienating voters who supported leaving the EU.
Conversely, some Labour and pro-EU voices welcomed Khan’s stance as a pragmatic defence of London’s economic interests, particularly in financial services, higher education, and international trade.
Khan’s remarks arrive amid ongoing debate within Labour over Brexit. While the party has largely shifted towards respecting the referendum outcome, factions remain that advocate closer ties with the EU, or even revisiting the question under certain circumstances. Khan’s position may highlight tensions between London’s urban electorate and other regions with different priorities.
Labour strategists stress that any attempt to reverse Brexit would require careful political calculation, as public opinion remains divided and the issue could dominate future elections.
For London, Khan argues that Brexit has already produced tangible economic and social consequences, from diminished EU funding to constraints on trade and mobility. He warns that reversing Brexit—or at least strengthening ties with Europe—would be crucial for maintaining the city’s global competitiveness.
Transport, finance, higher education, and cultural industries are among sectors most affected, with Khan highlighting the potential for lost opportunities if EU relations remain restricted.
Khan framed his Brexit ambitions as part of a broader vision for London’s role on the global stage. While critics focus on the political feasibility, supporters note that his position reflects the city’s unique economic and cultural needs in a post-Brexit world.
Analysts suggest that the mayor’s statements may influence national debate, particularly if economic pressures from the EU-UK relationship continue to mount. Whether Khan’s “ultimate goal” will translate into actionable policy remains uncertain, but it underscores the continuing salience of Brexit in UK politics.
“Reversing Brexit is not just about Europe; it’s about securing London’s future,” Khan concluded.


























































































