Published: 01 January 2026. The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online.
North Korea’s invincible alliance with Russia stood at the centre of Kim Jong‑un’s New Year address to his nation and armed forces with historic weight and political resolve driving every word. In the first major international statement of 2026, Kim Jong‑un praised the deepening invincible alliance between Pyongyang and Moscow, stressing the significance of military cooperation amid the ongoing Ukraine conflict. The message, delivered through North Korea’s state media, made clear that Moscow and Pyongyang were committed to strengthening bonds forged on shared battlefields and mutual strategic interests.
From the outset of his lengthy speech, Kim invoked the invincible alliance as a symbol of unwavering unity. He congratulated troops deployed abroad, urging them to remain brave and steadfast in what he called an “alien land,” a phrase used by the Korean Central News Agency in quoting his remarks.
Images released by KCNA showed Kim observing the New Year festivities at Pyongyang’s May Day Stadium, flanked by his wife Ri Sol‑ju and his daughter Ju Ae, widely viewed as his probable successor.
Kim emphasised that the invincible alliance was not simply military in nature, but a broader testament to unity and endurance. “Behind you are Pyongyang and Moscow,” he declared, underscoring how the two capitals stood shoulder to shoulder in the face of what the North Korean leader described as shared global challenges.
Many analysts believe this rhetoric is designed to reinforce a narrative of mutual loyalty that transcends mere battlefield cooperation. In recent years, thousands of North Korean soldiers are reported to have been deployed to Russia to bolster Moscow’s efforts in the Ukraine conflict, while Pyongyang receives economic and military support in return.
Despite mounting casualties and international scrutiny, Kim sought to frame the invincible alliance as a source of pride and honour for his nation. He lauded the so‑called heroic actions of troops abroad and assured citizens that their sacrifices were fortifying the ties between North Korea and Russia. This messaging aims to cultivate a sense of collective purpose, reinforcing loyalty at home while signalling strength to the outside world.
The presence of Ju Ae at the national celebration carried its own weight in the speech’s backdrop, symbolising continuity at a time of geopolitical strain. Her visibility alongside Kim during such a key moment fuels speculation about her role in the years ahead, especially as Pyongyang prepares for the anticipated Workers’ Party Congress in early 2026. Domestic policy achievements were also touched upon, with Kim praising infrastructure, agriculture, and military modernisation efforts over the past year. These references were strategically interwoven with his talk of the invincible alliance to paint a picture of internal progress alongside external solidarity.
International response to the speech has been cautious, with Western capitals reiterating concerns over Pyongyang’s involvement in the Ukraine war and its broader implications for regional security. Seoul’s intelligence assessments previously suggested that tens of thousands of North Korean troops have been sent to support Moscow – a claim that, if accurate, marks one of the most significant foreign deployments by Pyongyang since the Korean War. The strategic depth of the invincible alliance was further underscored by recent reports indicating ongoing exchanges of military technology and logistical support between the two governments, complicating efforts by Western nations to isolate either regime.
Human rights groups and diplomats have expressed alarm at the human cost behind the rhetoric. Accounts emerging from battle zones depict harsh conditions faced by North Korean soldiers integrated with Russian units, with casualties and battlefield attrition raising questions about the long‑term viability of such deployments. Critics argue that while Seoul and Kyiv’s intelligence figures vary, the spectre of heavy losses among North Korean troops has sparked debate on whether Pyongyang’s leadership fully understands or acknowledges the true toll of its military involvement.
For Kim Jong‑un, however, domestic audiences are being steered toward a narrative that casts the invincible alliance as essential to national dignity and global relevance. This messaging continues to resonate in a tightly controlled media landscape where allegiance to state policy is reinforced through ritualistic celebrations and public mobilisation.
As this new year unfolds, the emphasis on the invincible alliance will likely shape Pyongyang’s diplomatic posture and its orientation toward both allies and adversaries. The coming months are expected to bring further pronouncements from Kim on foreign policy, defence strategy, and national resilience, as the regime seeks to balance external pressures with internal consolidation.



























































































