Watchdog Probes Police Handling of Andrew Tate Abuse Claims

Published: March 27, 2026. The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online

The UK’s police watchdog has launched a formal investigation into how Hertfordshire Constabulary handled serious allegations of sexual abuse against the controversial social media influencer Andrew Tate. The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) confirmed this week that it is probing the force’s response to reports made by three women between 2014 and 2015, a case that was eventually closed in 2019 without charges. The announcement has sent shockwaves through the legal community, as it suggests potential “systemic failures” in the initial four-year investigation. In a significant escalation, Hertfordshire Constabulary announced yesterday that it would officially reopen its criminal investigation into the alleged rape and sexual assault offences, citing a commitment to ensuring such serious claims are “properly, thoroughly, and fully investigated.”

At the heart of the watchdog’s probe is the conduct of three former officers. A former detective constable is facing potential gross misconduct proceedings for “alleged failures to properly investigate” the evidence presented a decade ago. Furthermore, two former detective sergeants who supervised the original inquiry are being investigated for potential misconduct. The IOPC stated that its independent investigation will scrutinize the actions and decision-making of the force after a voluntary referral was made by Hertfordshire Police in late 2023. The watchdog’s move comes amid a backdrop of growing public scrutiny over how UK police forces manage high-profile cases involving violence against women and girls.

The three women who originally reported the abuse have welcomed the news in a poignant joint statement, describing the reinvestigation as “long overdue.” They expressed their gratitude to the IOPC for taking steps to address what they believe was a failure by the police to adequately consider the evidence during the first half of the decade. For these survivors, the reopening of the case represents a hard-fought victory in their search for justice, which has spanned nearly twelve years. Their legal team, McCue Jury & Partners, has also confirmed that the Crown Prosecution Service’s previous decision not to authorize charges is currently the subject of a “victim’s right to review,” adding another layer of legal pressure on the authorities.

The details contained within court documents related to these allegations are harrowing. One claimant alleges that the professional kickboxer held a gun to her face and threatened her, while another claims she was assaulted with a belt and grabbed by the throat on multiple occasions in 2015. Further allegations include claims of strangulation and explicit verbal threats of sexual violence. While the CPS stated as recently as last September that the “legal test” for criminal charges had not been met based on the evidence available at the time, the reopening of the police file suggests that investigators may be looking at the case through a fresh lens, potentially incorporating newer testimony or digital evidence.

Andrew Tate has “categorically” and “vehemently” denied all allegations made against him. His legal representatives have argued that the decision to revisit these claims—which were already dismissed in 2019 and again in 2025—is politically motivated rather than based on new evidence. They expressed “serious and legitimate concerns” about the integrity of the process, suggesting a perception that Tate is being subjected to repeated investigation due to his public profile. Despite these denials, Tate and his brother Tristan remain under significant legal pressure internationally; they are currently facing proceedings in Romania and are subject to a European arrest warrant from Bedfordshire Police for separate allegations of human trafficking and rape dating back to 2012.

The timing of the UK investigation is particularly critical as a civil trial brought by the four women is scheduled to take place in the High Court this June. The civil proceedings will allow for a lower burden of proof than a criminal trial, potentially providing a different avenue for accountability. The intersection of the IOPC probe, the reopened criminal investigation, and the upcoming civil trial has created a complex legal web that will likely keep the influencer’s past conduct at the center of the British national conversation for months to come. For the police, the stakes are equally high, as the watchdog’s findings could further damage public trust in the force’s ability to handle sensitive sexual offence inquiries.

As the IOPC progresses with its work, Hertfordshire Constabulary has stated it will not comment further to avoid prejudice to the ongoing proceedings. The force emphasized that its decision to reinvestigate reflects a modern commitment to “doing what is right,” regardless of how much time has passed since the alleged events occurred. For the women at the center of the claims, the reopening of the case is not just about a single individual, but about challenging a culture of investigative apathy that they believe allowed their voices to be silenced for far too long.

Read More At>>