Sinema lawsuit over Kyrsten Sinema marriage interference

Published: 16 January 2026. The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online.

Kyrsten Sinema is at the centre of a growing Sinema lawsuit after the ex-wife of her former bodyguard filed legal claims against her. Heather Ammel alleges Sinema deliberately pursued her husband, Matthew Ammel, knowing he was married, which led to the collapse of their once “good and loving” relationship. The Sinema lawsuit, seeking at least $75,000 in damages, claims emotional distress and financial harm caused by Sinema’s actions during the alleged affair.

Court documents indicate that Matthew Ammel, a retired army veteran, was employed by Sinema’s head of security in 2022. During this time, Sinema allegedly developed a romantic connection with Ammel and travelled with him to locations including Napa Valley, Las Vegas, and Saudi Arabia. According to the Sinema lawsuit, Heather Ammel discovered private messages in early 2024 between her husband and Sinema that were described as “romantic and lascivious,” sparking the breakdown of their marriage.

The complaint further alleges that Ammel stopped wearing his wedding ring while Sinema arranged employment for him as a national security fellow within her Senate office. Sinema allegedly continued to provide support for Ammel, including covering mental health treatment for post-traumatic stress, substance abuse, and traumatic brain injuries from his military service. Heather Ammel claims these actions were part of the interference that forms the basis of the Sinema lawsuit, illustrating intentional disruption of her marriage.

Filed quietly in Moore County, North Carolina, late last year, the Sinema lawsuit invokes the state’s rare “alienation of affection” statute. This law allows former spouses to seek damages from third parties believed responsible for marital breakdowns, though such claims are rarely successful. Sinema requested the case be moved from state to federal court, a move that could influence both procedural standards and potential outcomes.

Sinema’s political career has been unconventional, marked by a departure from the Democratic Party to serve as an independent, as well as controversy during her single Senate term. Since leaving office in 2024, she has joined the Washington-based law and lobbying firm Hogan Lovells, where she has pursued lobbying for data centres and psychedelic drug development. Legal experts highlight that the Sinema lawsuit may examine both her personal actions and professional conduct while in office, a rare scrutiny of ethical boundaries for former politicians.

While Sinema and her attorneys have not publicly commented, court filings suggest the case may hinge on communications, financial support, and other evidence that establishes deliberate interference in the marriage. Observers note that North Carolina remains one of the few states where alienation of affection suits are allowed, giving unique significance to this Sinema lawsuit.

The lawsuit highlights not only the personal impact on the Ammels but also potential reputational risks for Sinema as a public figure. Experts expect that testimony from friends, colleagues, and detailed records may play a pivotal role in determining whether Sinema’s alleged actions were intentional. The unusual nature of the claim has already attracted national attention, with discussions about personal accountability and ethical conduct in politics.

As legal proceedings unfold, the Sinema lawsuit serves as a lens for examining intersections of personal relationships, political power, and public scrutiny. The outcome could set precedents for similar cases and shape public perception of Sinema’s conduct, with broader implications for former officials who engage in private relationships with staff members.

Whether resolved in court or through settlement, the Sinema lawsuit has raised questions about boundaries, responsibility, and the application of historical statutes in modern legal contexts. For now, public attention remains focused on the unfolding legal strategy, the evidence presented, and the wider discussion about personal accountability in high-profile political figures’ lives.

Check our latest news