Smaller farms funding prioritised in England’s post-EU nature plans

Published: 08 January 2026. The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online.

Smaller farms funding will move to the centre of England’s nature recovery plans this year, as ministers prepare a significant change to post-EU agricultural payments. The environment secretary is expected to confirm that smaller holdings will receive first access to key environmental grants, marking a decisive shift in how public money supports farming communities. The announcement, due at the Oxford Farming Conference, reflects growing concern that limited budgets have historically favoured larger, better resourced estates.

Under the proposed changes, an application window for the Sustainable Farming Incentive will open in June exclusively for smaller farms and new entrants. Larger operations will be asked to wait until September before applying, a timetable designed to ensure fairer access to funds. Supporters argue the approach recognises that smaller farms funding delivers disproportionate public benefits through landscape stewardship, biodiversity protection, and local food resilience.

The Sustainable Farming Incentive forms part of the package replacing the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy. Rather than rewarding land ownership alone, the scheme pays farmers for environmental outcomes, soil health improvement, and protection of natural assets. These payments have become increasingly important as farms face rising costs, unstable markets, and more frequent extreme weather events.

For many businesses, environmental payments have provided a financial lifeline during inflationary pressures. Floods, droughts, and unpredictable seasons have placed additional strain on already narrow margins. Ministers believe prioritising smaller farms funding will help stabilise rural economies while advancing national climate and biodiversity goals.

The funding pot for the Sustainable Farming Incentive remains limited, creating intense competition among applicants. Last year, the scheme was abruptly closed when funds were exhausted, sparking anger across the farming sector. It later emerged that around 3,000 farms had been wrongly prevented from applying, fuelling distrust and calls for reform.

In her expected address, the environment secretary will emphasise the cultural and economic role farmers play across England. She is likely to stress that agriculture sustains communities, preserves heritage landscapes, and underpins national food security. The government’s message will focus on partnership, predictability, and long-term planning certainty.

Ministers have faced pressure from the Treasury to justify environmental spending during a challenging fiscal period. Officials at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs have argued consistently that nature schemes represent value for money. They maintain that smaller farms funding supports active land managers rather than subsidising passive wealth.

During last year’s spending review, the overall budget for environmental land management was cut by £100 million. That reduction intensified debates about who should benefit from the remaining resources. Internal discussions reportedly explored restricting access for highly profitable estates, redirecting funds towards vulnerable and labour-intensive farms.

Advocates of the new approach say it addresses long-standing inequalities. Smaller farms often lack dedicated staff to navigate complex application systems. When schemes operate on a first-come basis, those with greater administrative capacity tend to dominate. Prioritisation aims to correct that imbalance.

Industry reaction has been mixed. Some representative bodies have warned against excluding larger farms, arguing environmental outcomes require participation across all land types. They caution that delaying access could slow progress on national targets for carbon reduction and habitat restoration.

Others welcome the clarity the announcement provides. Farming networks focused on sustainable production have long argued that smaller farms funding better reflects the real public value generated by diversified, mixed systems. They point to benefits including employment, social cohesion, and reduced environmental intensity.

Rural communities often depend on smaller farms as anchors of local economies. These businesses support supply chains, maintain skills, and keep people living and working on the land. By contrast, consolidation and land concentration can weaken village life and reduce resilience.

Environmental groups also highlight the role of smaller farms in innovation. Many have pioneered agroecological practices, integrating wildlife corridors, soil regeneration, and low-input production. Supporters argue that directing funding towards these operations accelerates learning across the sector.

The government insists the policy does not represent a permanent exclusion of larger farms. Instead, officials frame it as a sequencing decision, ensuring that those historically disadvantaged receive a fair opportunity. Larger holdings will still be eligible later in the year, subject to budget availability.

Critics remain cautious, noting that uncertainty persists around long-term funding levels. Without increased budgets, prioritisation alone may not resolve systemic pressures facing agriculture. Farmers across England continue to seek reassurance that environmental payments will remain stable beyond annual cycles.

The wider context includes growing public demand for accountability in how subsidies are spent. Taxpayers increasingly expect visible environmental returns from agricultural support. By focusing on smaller farms funding, ministers hope to demonstrate alignment between public money and public goods.

Economists observing the shift suggest it could influence land values and business decisions. If environmental payments favour smaller operations, incentives to subdivide land or support new entrants may increase. Such changes could gradually reshape England’s rural landscape.

As June approaches, attention will turn to the details of eligibility criteria and payment rates. Farmers will scrutinise guidance closely, seeking assurance that the application process will be transparent and accessible. Trust, damaged by last year’s closure, remains fragile.

Ultimately, the success of the policy will depend on delivery. Clear communication, timely payments, and administrative simplicity will determine whether prioritisation achieves its goals. For now, the announcement signals a political commitment to rebalancing support.

If implemented effectively, the changes could mark a turning point in England’s agricultural policy. By placing smaller farms funding at the forefront, the government aims to support nature recovery while sustaining the people who manage the countryside daily.

Check our latest news