Published: 14 November 2025. The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online
Cristiano Ronaldo’s return to Dublin for Portugal’s World Cup qualifying clash against the Republic of Ireland was meant to be a nostalgic trip down memory lane. On the eve of the match, the five-time Ballon d’Or winner spoke fondly of his memories in the Irish capital, recalling the pre-season friendly he played for Real Madrid against Shamrock Rovers sixteen years ago at Aviva Stadium. Ronaldo had promised in the press conference that he would “try to be a good boy,” a tongue-in-cheek assurance meant to ward off the taunts of Irish fans. Yet, as the match unfolded, he instead cemented his reputation as one of Ireland’s footballing nemeses.
The drama reached its peak in the 60th minute, with Portugal trailing 2-0 thanks to Troy Parrott’s first-half brace. Ronaldo, awaiting a cross inside the Irish penalty area, found himself jostling for position against Ipswich defender Dara O’Shea. In a heated moment, the 40-year-old forward shoved his elbow into O’Shea’s back, sending the defender sprawling to the turf. The incident immediately sparked uproar among the Irish players and supporters, who vocally demanded action. Referee Glenn Nyberg initially brandished a yellow card, but following consultation with the video assistant referee and an on-pitch review, Nyberg upgraded the sanction to a red card.
The sending-off was a dramatic and controversial moment in a game already fraught with tension. Rather than quietly exiting the pitch, Ronaldo turned his departure into a theatrical display, sarcastically applauding the Irish supporters and exchanging sharp words with Republic of Ireland manager Heimir Hallgrimsson before leaving the field. The interaction marked the climax of an intriguing spat between the superstar and the Icelander, whose pre-match comments appeared to be aimed at influencing Ronaldo’s behavior.
Hallgrimsson had hinted at psychological tactics prior to the game, urging referees not to be swayed by Ronaldo’s stature and influence. The Irish manager cited Portugal’s previous meeting with Ireland in October, where Ronaldo had a penalty saved, claiming the star had “controlled the referee.” “He complimented me for putting pressure on the referee,” Hallgrimsson said, reflecting on a handshake that concluded their earlier press conference exchange. “It was his action on the pitch that cost him the red card. It had nothing to do with me—unless I got into his head.”
When asked if he spoke with Ronaldo following the match, Hallgrimsson downplayed any lingering tensions. “No, I think we spoke enough when he came off. There was nothing to speak about. This was just a moment of a little silliness from him, I would say.” His measured response contrasted sharply with the reaction from Portugal boss Roberto Martinez, who defended his captain while subtly criticizing Hallgrimsson’s comments.
Martinez framed the red card as an unfortunate moment for a player who had never been sent off in 226 international appearances. “The red card is just a captain that has never been sent off before in 226 games—I think that just deserves credit—and today, I thought it was a bit harsh because he cares about the team,” Martinez said. He emphasized that Ronaldo had been repeatedly impeded inside the box, “being grabbed, being pulled, being pushed,” and that the incident, while appearing dramatic on camera, was far less severe in reality. “I think the action looks worse than what it actually is. I don’t think it’s an elbow, I think it’s a full body, but from where the camera is, it looks like an elbow. But we accept it.”
Martinez also expressed frustration with Hallgrimsson’s pre-match comments about referees, implying that such remarks may have indirectly influenced how events unfolded on the pitch. “The only thing that leaves a bitter taste in my mouth is at the press conference yesterday, your coach was talking about the aspect of the referees being influenced, and then a big centre-half falls on the floor so dramatically at the turn of Cristiano’s body.”
The consequences of Ronaldo’s red card extend beyond disciplinary embarrassment. He will miss Portugal’s upcoming qualifier against Armenia, and under Fifa’s disciplinary code, he could face a three-match suspension for violent conduct. Chapter two, Article 14(i) of the Fifa regulations stipulates that players shall be suspended for assault, including elbowing, punching, kicking, or hitting an opponent, with a minimum of three matches or an appropriate period for the infraction.
If Ronaldo receives a three-match ban and Portugal automatically qualifies for the World Cup in North America, he would miss the first two group-stage games. Should Portugal instead drop into the playoff round, he would serve his suspension during those matches. The final determination will rest with Fifa’s disciplinary committee, meaning Ronaldo’s potential swansong on the world stage hangs in the balance. Regardless, his dramatic return to Dublin, replete with controversy and theatrics, captivated fans and media alike.
The context of the match added layers of complexity to the incident. Portugal, aiming to secure World Cup qualification, was under intense pressure, and Ronaldo’s frustration had been evident throughout the game. His interactions with the Irish defense showcased not only his competitive fire but also the tactical awareness that has defined his career. While the elbow—or shoving action—was brief, it became the focal point of discussions post-match, highlighting the fine line elite athletes navigate between physicality and disciplinary risk.
Media coverage of the red card emphasized both the symbolic and practical dimensions of the incident. For Irish fans, Ronaldo has long occupied the role of a pantomime villain, dating back to numerous encounters in high-stakes European and international fixtures. His behavior in Dublin reinforced that perception, combining skill, competitiveness, and occasional provocation into a package that ignites passion on both sides of the pitch.
For Portugal, the incident sparked debate about leadership and sportsmanship. Martinez’s defense framed Ronaldo as a devoted captain caught in the intensity of the match, while critics argued that veteran players bear responsibility for modeling composure and restraint. This tension underscores the broader discourse in professional sports, where star athletes are simultaneously celebrated for competitiveness and scrutinized for lapses in decorum.
In addition to tactical and disciplinary implications, Ronaldo’s red card has potential repercussions for Portugal’s World Cup campaign. With qualifying matches and the possibility of playoff fixtures looming, his availability—or lack thereof—could influence squad selection, team morale, and tactical planning. Coaches and analysts are now considering how to adjust strategies in light of a potential absence, particularly given Ronaldo’s centrality to Portugal’s offensive setup.
Beyond immediate sporting concerns, the incident also resonated in the broader cultural landscape of football. Ronaldo’s persona, both on and off the field, is a source of fascination for fans, journalists, and commentators worldwide. The Aviva Stadium episode adds another chapter to his storied career, illustrating how a single action—an elbow, a shove, or a moment of frustration—can reverberate across national narratives and international media coverage.
Despite the controversy, Ronaldo’s historical ties to Dublin remained a point of reflection. His first game in Ireland for Real Madrid, the media interactions leading up to the match, and his flamboyant response to the red card all underscore the complex interplay between personal history, competitive instinct, and public expectation. The city of Dublin, which once witnessed a young Ronaldo taking early steps in European football, became the stage for a dramatic and headline-grabbing episode decades later.
In summary, the Aviva Stadium incident captured the drama, skill, and unpredictability of modern football. Ronaldo’s red card sparked debate among managers, fans, and pundits alike, touching on issues of discipline, psychological gamesmanship, and the pressures facing elite athletes. While the disciplinary outcome remains pending, the event itself has already left an indelible mark on the narrative of Portugal’s World Cup qualifying campaign and on Ronaldo’s legendary career.




























































































