The Race for Radical Change in Westminster

Published: 05 June 2026. The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online.

Andy Burnham has signaled he would begin transforming England’s broken social care system this year. He would act immediately if he became prime minister, bringing radical reform to the country. The Greater Manchester mayor accused Westminster politicians of flinching away from tackling difficult policy problems. He said politicians must be willing to take on the weight of the system. This massive institutional weight has stood in the way of radical national change for decades.

Burnham began to set out his prospectus for government during a crucial regional campaign. He is currently fighting to win the high stakes Makerfield parliamentary byelection for Labour. The mayoral candidate first tried to change the social care system back in 2009. He held the position of Labour’s health secretary during that challenging political period. Burnham stated there was an urgent national need to fix the worsening care crisis.

In 2009, he planned a levy on estates to pay for universal social care. In recent years, he has talked about replacing inheritance tax with a care levy. This progressive new levy would successfully fund a comprehensive national social care service. He described the desperate need to fix social care as an urgent national priority. Burnham promised he would look at all implications regarding inheritance tax and care charges. He stated firmly that he would not flinch from making these tough decisions.

The candidate suggested bringing forward the highly anticipated independent Casey review of social care. This review is tasked with drawing up proposals on funding for the future. The original timeline placed the final publication of this review in the year 2028. Burnham said he would like it published by the end of 2026 instead. He wants to focus heavily on social care measures that could be implemented quickly.

On Thursday night, Burnham confirmed he intends to run in a Labour leadership contest. He made this major confirmation during an exclusive interview with a national newspaper reporter. The interview took place while he was actively campaigning on the ground in Makerfield. He is currently fighting hard to hold this vital seat for his party. The constituency faces a very significant electoral threat from the rising Reform UK party.

Burnham argued that the Labour party should always operate as a broad political church. He wants to see more government ministers chosen from the left of the party. However, he stated that Jeremy Corbyn should not be allowed back into Labour. The mayoral candidate signaled there would be no snap election if he replaced Starmer. He strongly defended himself from criticism over running a shadow leadership campaign this month.

He defended his controversial comments about politicians and international financial markets. Burnham previously stated that British politicians should not be in hock to bond markets. He denied he was boxing himself in by sticking to current fiscal rules. The candidate argued it would be a mistake to rerun the Brexit referendum now. However, he explicitly stated that he wanted the UK to rejoin the EU. He hopes this significant geopolitical return will happen comfortably within his own lifetime.

Burnham praised Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood for facing up to big immigration issues. Since his selection for the seat, Burnham has navigated a very difficult political path. He has balanced setting out his vision while denying any purely personal ambition. He claimed he was one hundred percent focused on winning the upcoming byelection. The candidate said it felt weird being asked about future cabinet appointments now.

However, he told a television audience that he would challenge current leadership in Westminster. He noted that Wes Streeting seems to have launched a shadow leadership contest already. If that contest is currently running, Burnham intends to join the race immediately. He acknowledged he would need to persuade members of the parliamentary Labour party first.

As the Labour party hovered on the brink of civil war, No 10 responded. A spokesperson said Keir Starmer would not walk away from Downing Street anytime soon. The country expects the government to focus on delivering change for hard working people. The spokesperson added that leaders should not get distracted by internal Westminster debates. The Labour party has a specific process for challenging a leader in office. This internal process has not been triggered by any members of parliament yet.

The prime minister will not walk away from his democratic mandate of 2024. That mandate was given just two years ago to build a fairer Britain. Earlier, Burnham said he was not making assumptions about life after the byelection. Many different political factors will come into play after the votes are counted. The public gave the party the clearest of messages in the May elections.

Citizens are loudly saying that modern politics is simply not working for them anymore. If politics does not change now, Britain could become as polarized as America. Burnham said the shallowness of Westminster meant important issues went completely unresolved for years. He encountered a deep sadness on the doorstep regarding the lack of change. He promised he would not say something and then fail to deliver it.

Breaking promises has dragged British politics to a very low faith position with voters. He denied leaving himself little room for maneuver regarding the strict fiscal rules. The current rules have actually freed up significant resource for vital public investment. It is about using that public money as productively as possible across departments. This money can certainly be spent in different ways to maximize social value.

In Manchester, he successfully took local buses back into public control recently. This popular transport move halved local fares from four pounds to two pounds. Nationally, he would reallocate thirty nine billion pounds earmarked for housing social initiatives. This massive funding would be used solely to build high quality social homes. He believes there should be much more fiscal devolution to local authorities.

This devolution should include allowing local councils to levy a targeted tourist tax. Burnham suggested replacing the iniquitous council tax system with a land value tax. He also said public sector procurement should always prioritize struggling British manufacturing industries. He attempted to clarify his remarks about being in hock to bond markets. He claimed his economic comments had been misinterpreted by rivals for political ends.

His core argument was that previous politicians had left the country in debt. Giving up the levers of control results in losing control of spending. This makes it impossible to run a highly productive and efficient state apparatus. His argument is focused on retaking control to give the treasury economic headroom. This strategy means the government is not always looking over its shoulder nervously.

Immigration comes up regularly during doorstep conversations with voters in Makerfield. Burnham was notably supportive of the controversial changes introduced by the home secretary. He applauded Mahmood for the way she gripped these incredibly difficult issues. He stated he would not shy away from public concerns over small boat crossings. The government needs to consider further approaches to immigration that are more robust.

However, he added there must be human balance within the immigration system. There must be safe and legal routes to the UK for refugees. People already in the country need a clear route to legal employment. This allows them to contribute to the economy rather than remaining in limbo. A Labour government should put damaging factionalism behind it for the national interest.

The party must draw on all parts of the movement to succeed. This strategy raises the prospect of leftwingers gaining ministerial jobs under his leadership. In an implicit criticism of Starmer, he highlighted the stripping of the whip. Several Labour MPs lost the whip after voting against the central leadership. Burnham stated that he has always tried to unify people instead of dividing.

He mentioned the common joke about different party factions meeting in a bar. He can laugh about factional jokes to a certain degree in private. However, these jokes say more about the factional people telling them than him. He has always been a politician focused on unifying people across boundaries. Politics desperately needs less division and less bitter factionalism in modern times.

Burnham said some leftwingers should never have been kicked out of the party. He specifically named Faiza Shaheen and Jamie Driscoll as examples of bad exclusions. However, he drew a firm line at welcoming Jeremy Corbyn back into Labour. He said the situation had gone beyond the time for a return. Many inside the party remain uncomfortable with the shadow leadership campaign taking place.

Burnham stated he did not create the current tension existing in Westminster. He cannot be held responsible for what goes on in the capital. Obviously, he has to respond to political events as they unfold naturally. If the parliamentary party wants a change in direction, he will respond. He last spoke to Starmer the Sunday before his selection for Makerfield.

Their relationship remains respectful, and they are always honest with each other. He declined to answer further questions about an immediate change in party leadership. What comes beyond the byelection will be faced when the time arrives. He does not want constituents to think he believes this race is easy. People want to get ahead of things, but he is focused locally.

The political speculation about general elections and cabinet positions feels very weird to him. His headspace is nowhere near the media gossip columns at the moment. He reads the news, but his mind is entirely on this byelection. However, Burnham did appear to rule out calling a snap general election. He believes there is a limit to how much campaigning the public wants.

He indicated that Josh Simons could be part of his future leadership team. Simons stepped aside from the seat and is working on policy development. There are no guarantees in politics, but he likes working with Simons. Burnham did not rule out finding another seat if he loses to Reform. He also suggested he could stay on as Greater Manchester mayor regardless.

He would work on the assumption of seeing out his mayoral term successfully. Burnham shrugged off suggestions that Streeting was trying to corner him on Europe. He thinks that theory takes complex political machinations a bit too far. He has a very clear and consistent position on the European Union. Some people call his stance a U-turn, but he disagrees completely.

He remains of the view that Britain should rejoin the European Union. That long term hope does not mean rerunning the referendum right now. Rerunning Brexit at this moment would be a terrible mistake for national unity. It would simply entrench the deep feelings of division across British society. The country must fix its own domestic economic fundamentals before altering foreign relationships.

The national focus should be relentlessly domestic during this difficult economic period. Burnham declined to describe the ongoing catastrophe on the ground in Gaza as genocide. He cannot judge international events of that enormity from his mayoral position. However, he has deep concerns about the disproportionate nature of the military destruction. There must be a full international process of investigation and legal accountability.

He defended Starmer’s diplomatic approach to managing relationships with Donald Trump. Normally, a prime minister wants a good working relationship with the United States. But if you cannot agree with them, you must say that openly. That is the only effective way to deal with his unique presidency. The transatlantic relationship is vital, but Britain should not blindly agree with everything. The UK has got into trouble in the past when doing that. He believes the cautious approach Starmer has taken is entirely correct.

Check our latest news