Published: 10 January 2026. The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online.
Zarah Sultana’s Your Party membership launch has drawn intense scrutiny, with concerns rising over potential criminal activity. The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) suggested that Sultana’s unauthorised portal could constitute a “serious criminal matter” and recommended referring the case to the police. The focus on Your Party membership has dominated political discussions since an email to 800,000 supporters encouraged paid enrolment for £55, raising urgent questions about data security and proper authorisation. Sultana, however, reassured followers that the portal was “safe and secure” despite technical issues due to high traffic, while Jeremy Corbyn’s Peace and Justice Project (PJP) distanced itself from the launch, highlighting potential legal complications.
The dispute escalated after Sultana revealed the new Your Party membership portal on X, urging supporters to “be a part of history.” Hours later, Corbyn issued a statement advising members to ignore the site and confirmed legal advice was being sought. The split exposed tensions within the broader socialist movement, reflecting differing approaches to party membership and organisational control. Corbyn’s team had initially referred the issue to the ICO last September over fears of a data breach and unauthorised processing of personal information.
Following a thorough review, the ICO concluded the matter did not require its formal intervention at this stage. Instead, it recommended that the PJP consider contacting Report Fraud and the police to determine if the Your Party membership launch involved criminal activity. The ICO stressed that “serious criminal activity may have occurred,” noting that any police investigation would take precedence over its own processes. Despite this, sources close to Sultana have indicated that police involvement is expected to be minimal, as the case appears unlikely to meet prosecutorial thresholds.
Sultana later issued a statement asserting that the ICO had effectively “dropped the case” regarding the Your Party membership portal. She described the outcome as anticipated and welcomed the closure, signalling a readiness to focus on political organisation rather than procedural disputes. On X, she emphasised her commitment to building a “Central Executive Committee (CEC) that breaks decisively from Labour right tactics, gives power to members and local branches, and helps build a mass movement for socialism.”
Analysts have noted that the Your Party membership issue has wider implications for internal socialist politics in the UK. By centralising membership sign-ups through an online portal, Sultana aimed to consolidate power and strengthen grassroots participation, but the ICO guidance highlights the delicate balance between digital innovation and compliance with data protection laws. Experts suggest that even if criminal proceedings do not follow, the controversy may shape perceptions of governance standards within emerging socialist movements.
Critics argue that the Your Party membership portal launch reflects insufficient oversight and raises questions about transparency. Supporters, however, view Sultana’s initiative as a necessary step to modernise party infrastructure and expand grassroots engagement. The divergence of opinion underscores the challenges faced by new political organisations in maintaining credibility while adopting digital tools for growth.
The ICO’s involvement and subsequent recommendation to involve law enforcement illustrate how seriously data breaches and unauthorised online activity are taken in the UK political landscape. Legal commentators emphasise that even when formal enforcement action is unlikely, advisory guidance carries weight, particularly when high-profile figures like Sultana are implicated. The Your Party membership launch now serves as a cautionary example for other political entities attempting rapid digital expansion.
Despite the controversy, Sultana has signalled a clear strategic focus on growing the movement. Her team reported that the party has now reached 60,000 members, claiming the largest socialist membership in the UK since the 1940s. The continued emphasis on community-driven engagement indicates that the Your Party membership portal, while controversial, has also reinforced Sultana’s organisational objectives and long-term political vision.
Observers expect that the Your Party membership debate will continue to influence UK socialist discourse, with implications for party structure, membership management, and compliance protocols. The unfolding scenario highlights tensions between ambition, legal responsibility, and accountability in modern political movements, illustrating the potential pitfalls of rapid online mobilisation. Sultana’s navigation of these challenges will likely set precedents for future initiatives within the UK socialist landscape.
By addressing both procedural concerns and organisational goals, Sultana seeks to maintain momentum despite scrutiny. The Your Party membership portal remains a central element of her strategy, balancing engagement with legal and ethical considerations. Her focus on a mass movement approach suggests that the controversy may ultimately galvanise support, rather than diminish it, highlighting the evolving nature of party politics in the digital age.
The ICO’s guidance, combined with Sultana’s proactive statements, underscores the necessity of clarity and diligence in political campaigns. The Your Party membership incident serves as a critical lesson in data governance, public communication, and leadership accountability. While immediate legal consequences appear limited, the episode reinforces the importance of measured planning and compliance for emerging parties navigating complex regulatory environments.
Sultana remains committed to developing the Your Party membership framework, asserting that the project will continue to prioritise member empowerment, transparency, and strategic expansion. The ongoing attention from media and political analysts highlights the enduring significance of the case, both for Sultana personally and for the wider trajectory of socialist politics in the UK.



























































































