Pizza Express Investigated Prince Andrew's Woking Alibi Claim

Published: 6 July 2026 | The English Chronicle Desk | The English Chronicle Online

For years, one of the most widely discussed details surrounding Prince Andrew’s infamous BBC Newsnight interview was his insistence that he had been at a Pizza Express restaurant in Woking on the evening Virginia Giuffre alleged she was trafficked to meet him by the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The claim quickly became one of the most recognisable elements of the royal scandal, attracting widespread public attention and becoming deeply embedded in British popular culture.

Now, fresh reports have revealed that Pizza Express itself once launched an internal inquiry into the Duke of York’s highly publicised account in an effort to establish whether any evidence existed to support the extraordinary claim. The revelation offers a rare glimpse into how one of Britain’s best-known restaurant chains unexpectedly found itself caught at the centre of one of the biggest royal controversies in modern history.

The inquiry, according to reports published in the United Kingdom, took place after Prince Andrew’s appearance on the BBC’s Newsnight programme in November 2019. During the interview, conducted by journalist Emily Maitlis, Andrew categorically denied allegations made by Virginia Giuffre that he had sexually assaulted her when she was 17 years old after she was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

Attempting to refute Giuffre’s account, Andrew insisted that on the evening in question he had been with one of his daughters at a children’s birthday party before travelling to Pizza Express in Woking, Surrey. He maintained that he clearly remembered the outing because it was an unusual journey for him and claimed it would have been impossible for him to have been elsewhere that evening.

His statement immediately attracted enormous public interest.

Rather than convincing critics, the Pizza Express alibi rapidly became one of the most scrutinised aspects of the interview. Within hours, journalists, legal commentators and members of the public were examining every detail of Andrew’s recollection. Social media users produced countless jokes and memes referencing the restaurant, while the Woking branch unexpectedly became one of the most talked-about Pizza Express locations in the country.

According to newly published accounts, senior figures within Pizza Express quietly sought to determine whether any historical records could verify the Duke’s visit. The company reportedly reviewed whatever information remained available from that period, although the alleged visit had taken place many years earlier.

Like many restaurant businesses at the time, Pizza Express did not possess extensive customer databases capable of confirming individual visits made years before. Electronic booking systems were far less sophisticated than they are today, while many customers simply walked into restaurants without making reservations.

Investigators reportedly also faced practical difficulties because CCTV recordings were routinely deleted after relatively short periods and no longer existed from the date in question. Staff turnover over many years further reduced the possibility of identifying employees who might have remembered serving a member of the Royal Family.

Ultimately, the inquiry was unable to establish any evidence capable of either confirming or disproving Prince Andrew’s account.

The absence of proof did not necessarily undermine the Duke’s version of events, but neither did it provide the independent corroboration that many observers believed would strengthen his defence.

The Newsnight interview itself has since become recognised as one of the most damaging media appearances ever given by a senior member of the British Royal Family.

Throughout the programme, Prince Andrew rejected every allegation made against him but delivered several explanations that attracted widespread criticism. Alongside the Pizza Express claim, he insisted that he had a medical condition preventing him from sweating at the time, challenging another aspect of Virginia Giuffre’s account.

Communications experts, legal analysts and public relations professionals overwhelmingly concluded that the interview had failed to improve Andrew’s position. Instead, many argued it intensified public scrutiny while raising additional questions about his judgment.

The consequences were swift.

Within days of the interview, Prince Andrew announced that he would step back from public royal duties following discussions with Queen Elizabeth II. Numerous charitable organisations, military appointments and business associations also distanced themselves from the Duke as pressure mounted.

The controversy continued for several years before reaching another major turning point in 2022.

Although Prince Andrew repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and has never faced criminal charges relating to Virginia Giuffre’s allegations, he agreed to settle her civil lawsuit in the United States without admitting liability.

The financial settlement brought an end to the legal proceedings but did not resolve the wider public debate surrounding the case.

Meanwhile, Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal activities continued to cast a long shadow over numerous prominent individuals associated with him.

Epstein was arrested in 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges but died in prison while awaiting trial. His death was officially ruled a suicide.

His longtime associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, was later convicted in the United States for recruiting and grooming underage girls for Epstein’s abuse. She is currently serving a lengthy prison sentence after being found guilty on multiple federal charges.

Virginia Giuffre became one of Epstein’s most prominent accusers and played a central role in exposing the network surrounding the convicted financier. Her allegations against Prince Andrew attracted international attention and became one of the highest-profile legal disputes involving a member of the British Royal Family in modern history.

The unexpected role played by Pizza Express illustrates how ordinary businesses can become entangled in events far beyond their control.

The Woking restaurant itself experienced years of unusual attention following the interview. Visitors regularly travelled to the branch to take photographs outside the building, while references to Pizza Express in Woking became a recurring feature of British comedy, television programmes and online discussions.

Although the publicity significantly increased public recognition of the location, company executives generally avoided commenting publicly on the controversy, preferring not to become involved in political or legal debates surrounding the Duke.

The revelation that the company quietly investigated Andrew’s account demonstrates how seriously it treated claims that directly involved one of its restaurants. Even if no conclusive evidence could be found, conducting an internal review was viewed as a responsible step given the extraordinary level of international media attention focused on the business.

Experts note that verifying historical claims involving private customer visits is often extremely difficult, particularly when many years have passed. Data retention policies, privacy laws and technological limitations mean businesses rarely preserve detailed records indefinitely unless required for financial or regulatory purposes.

In this case, the alleged visit dated back to 2001, almost two decades before the Newsnight interview transformed the restaurant into an unlikely symbol of one of Britain’s most significant royal scandals.

For Pizza Express, the episode became an unexpected chapter in the company’s long history. A restaurant chain known primarily for family dining and casual Italian cuisine suddenly found itself mentioned in newspapers around the world, not because of its food or business performance, but because of an alibi that would become one of the most memorable moments in modern British television.

Years later, the phrase “Pizza Express in Woking” continues to evoke immediate recognition among many people in the UK and beyond. It has entered popular culture as shorthand for one of the most controversial royal interviews ever broadcast.

The newly reported internal inquiry does not settle the debate over Prince Andrew’s movements on the night in question. Instead, it highlights the practical challenges of reconstructing events many years after they occurred and underscores the lasting impact that a single televised interview can have—not only on public figures, but also on businesses unexpectedly drawn into the spotlight.

As renewed attention falls on the episode, the story serves as another reminder of how closely the worlds of royalty, media, law and public perception can intersect, leaving lasting consequences for everyone involved.

Checkout Our Latest News On>>