Published: 03 December 2025. The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online.
Nigel Farage has told donors that he expects a deal or merger between Reform UK and the Conservative party. According to sources who spoke to the Financial Times, Farage described such an agreement as “inevitable” ahead of the next general election. He clarified that the process would take time, as he remains cautious about formalising a pact with the Conservatives. Farage emphasised he would never collaborate with a party he does not trust, rejecting any suggestions of a standard alliance. Instead, he framed the arrangement as a “reverse takeover,” signalling a strategic approach to potential negotiations. Both Farage and the Conservative party have publicly denied any such claims, maintaining their separate political positions.
A Conservative spokesperson reiterated that, under Kemi Badenoch’s leadership, the party will not pursue any deals or pacts with Reform UK. They criticised Farage’s proposals, noting that the party’s stance on higher welfare spending and perceived friendliness toward foreign leaders diverges from Conservative principles. The spokesperson added that only the Conservatives have the structure, experience, and plans required to govern effectively. Despite Farage’s ambitions, the party leadership insists that Reform UK’s proposals would not align with the Conservative policy framework, highlighting a clear ideological divide between the two organisations. Badenoch herself described the party as a nearly 200-year-old institution that cannot be treated like a toy.
Farage has actively sought to attract disillusioned Conservative voters, arguing that the party has lost public trust after fourteen years in government. Several former Conservatives have defected to Reform UK in recent years, including high-profile figures such as Jonathan Gullis, Danny Kruger, Nadine Dorries, Jake Berry, and Maria Caulfield. These moves underscore Farage’s strategy of positioning Reform UK as a viable alternative for right-leaning voters. Despite Reform’s growing appeal, Conservative fundraising continues to outperform, with the party receiving £6.3 million in donations in the first half of the year. In comparison, Reform raised £2.1 million, highlighting the financial disparity between the established party and Farage’s organisation.
Labour party representatives responded critically to Farage’s comments, accusing him of orchestrating a backroom plot to prop up his party. They claimed that any alliance between Reform and the Conservatives would inflict further austerity on the country, damaging public services and straining family finances. Labour spokespersons highlighted the risks posed to local schools and hospitals under a potential collaboration. They argued that Farage’s plans demonstrate an inability to prioritise citizens’ well-being, contrasting this with Labour’s focus on reducing the cost of living, lowering national debt, and cutting NHS waiting times. The statements emphasised the political consequences of any perceived compromise between Reform and the Tories.
Despite public denials, speculation about a deal continues to dominate political discourse, reflecting widespread interest in potential shifts within the UK’s right-wing electorate. Farage’s statements to donors suggest he is considering tactical manoeuvres to expand Reform UK’s influence in national politics. Observers note that formal negotiations would require careful navigation, given the ideological differences and historical tensions between the two parties. Any arrangement could also face scrutiny from voters and media alike, especially given the Conservatives’ longstanding institutional presence. Analysts suggest that the combination of political strategy, defections, and fundraising advantages could influence future election outcomes if Farage’s predictions materialise.
Farage’s messaging indicates a long-term strategy to capitalise on public dissatisfaction with traditional Conservative leadership. By positioning Reform UK as an alternative for former Tory voters, Farage aims to consolidate support ahead of the next election. Meanwhile, the Conservatives continue to project stability and governance capability, emphasising their leadership team and institutional experience. This contrast frames a competitive environment for right-leaning voters and underscores the significance of the upcoming election in shaping political alliances. Any future collaboration between the parties would require negotiation, compromise, and careful management of public perception. Farage’s statements reflect ongoing political manoeuvring as the next election approaches.
Reform UK’s recent polling success illustrates the party’s potential to influence the political landscape, even without formal collaboration with the Conservatives. By attracting former Conservative members, the party seeks to broaden its base and gain legitimacy in national politics. Farage’s emphasis on strategic alliances suggests that negotiations will remain a central component of his electoral strategy. Observers note that while financial resources, donor support, and public perception all influence outcomes, ideological alignment remains critical. Reform’s growing profile and Farage’s tactical messaging are likely to shape right-wing politics in the United Kingdom in the lead-up to the next general election.



























































































