Chagos Islands deal gains Trump approval after Starmer call

Published: 06 February 2026. The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online.

The Chagos Islands deal has prompted renewed attention after Donald Trump softened his criticism following a call with Keir Starmer. The US president had previously described the UK’s plan to cede sovereignty over the British Indian Ocean Territory, including the strategic Diego Garcia base, as an “act of great stupidity.” This strong critique raised international concerns about national security implications and US strategic interests. After speaking with Starmer, Trump now described the arrangement as “the best he could make,” signalling a significant shift in his stance on the transfer.

Under the deal, the UK will return sovereignty over the islands to Mauritius, while Diego Garcia will remain leased for 99 years, ensuring continued joint US-UK military operations. Trump acknowledged that the base is “strategically situated in the middle of the Indian Ocean,” emphasising its critical role in supporting military capabilities and broader security objectives. He reinforced that if the lease were ever threatened, the US reserves the right to safeguard and reinforce its presence at Diego Garcia, highlighting enduring strategic priorities.

Trump’s reversal comes after months of controversy surrounding the handover. His earlier posts on Truth Social criticised the UK for weakening its geopolitical position, claiming China and Russia were closely observing the “act of total weakness.” The former president also suggested that national security concerns justified the US acquiring Greenland, demonstrating how closely the administration linked island sovereignty to broader military strategy.

The latest statement appears to recognise both the strategic importance of Diego Garcia and the practical limitations facing the UK in negotiating the deal. Downing Street confirmed that Starmer and Trump “agreed on the importance of the deal to secure the joint UK-US base on Diego Garcia, which remains vital to shared security interests.” Officials also stressed that the UK and US would continue collaborative efforts to implement the agreement, reinforcing the broader Anglo-American security relationship.

Conservative MPs and Reform UK critics remain deeply concerned about the transfer. Priti Patel, the shadow foreign secretary, condemned the arrangement as a “massive strategic blunder” and warned that the lease could fail, potentially compromising both UK and allied security. Despite Trump’s endorsement, Patel reiterated that the opposition would persist in challenging the deal, arguing that ceding control of such strategically valuable territory represents a long-term vulnerability.

The Chagos Islands controversy highlights the balancing act governments face between historical territorial obligations and modern defence priorities. For decades, Diego Garcia has served as a critical hub for US military operations, providing logistical support across the Indian Ocean and Middle East regions. Its importance has been reinforced during recent global crises, underlining why the lease arrangement remains central to Anglo-American defence planning.

Analysts note that Trump’s softened stance could reflect both diplomatic pragmatism and recognition of the complexities surrounding the Chagos deal. While his previous comments emphasised unilateral security measures and aggressive territorial acquisitions, the new position appears calibrated to maintain long-term US influence without undermining Starmer’s negotiated agreement. Such recalibration suggests that strategic communication between the two governments is crucial for avoiding misunderstandings with broader global implications.

The ongoing debate over Chagos also intersects with environmental and human rights considerations. Indigenous Chagossians displaced during the original British administration continue to seek recognition and reparations. While the lease arrangement preserves military priorities, questions remain regarding sovereignty, compensation, and ethical obligations to the islanders. Balancing these factors alongside national security imperatives has become a diplomatic tightrope for the UK government.

Observers have further noted the wider geopolitical dimensions. The Indian Ocean is a hotspot for strategic competition, with China’s maritime expansion and Russia’s naval operations drawing increased attention. Diego Garcia’s location allows rapid deployment of forces and monitoring of key sea lanes, enhancing US and UK influence in a region critical to international trade and security. Maintaining the lease ensures that allied powers retain a forward operating base essential for projecting military strength and responding to regional contingencies.

Trump’s comments also reflect a broader pattern of recalibrating foreign policy priorities after consultation with allies. Previously, his proposals on Greenland had suggested unilateral control to serve US interests, but engagement with international partners, including NATO, encouraged compromise. The Chagos case demonstrates how dialogue and negotiation can temper initially confrontational positions, allowing both parties to secure strategic objectives while reducing public controversy.

Starmer’s diplomatic approach has been widely credited with stabilising the agreement. By emphasising shared security responsibilities and presenting the handover as part of a broader strategic framework, the UK prime minister has sought to mitigate international concerns while preserving national influence. Cooperation on military bases, joint exercises, and intelligence sharing further cements the UK-US alliance, demonstrating the enduring importance of close coordination in defence and foreign policy.

Despite political disagreements within the UK, the Chagos Islands lease continues to attract attention in Washington. Congressional observers and defence analysts have highlighted Diego Garcia’s ongoing relevance, noting that any disruption could have cascading effects on global operations. Trump’s recognition of the base’s importance underscores continuity in US defence strategy, even amid domestic political shifts and evolving international pressures.

In conclusion, the Chagos Islands deal reflects a complex interplay between historical sovereignty, strategic military priorities, and international diplomacy. Trump’s softened criticism after consulting Starmer illustrates the pragmatic adjustments leaders may make in pursuit of shared security objectives. As the UK and US implement the 99-year lease, attention will remain focused on maintaining strategic advantage, protecting national security, and addressing ethical considerations regarding displaced Chagossians. The agreement serves as a case study in balancing geopolitical imperatives with domestic politics, highlighting the importance of ongoing dialogue and strategic foresight.

Check our latest news