Published: 03 August ‘2025. The English Chronicle Online.
The chief executive of Yorkshire Water, Nicola Shaw, has come under fire following revelations that she received an additional £1.3 million in undisclosed payments through an offshore parent company, Kelda Holdings, since 2023. This information, initially withheld and only disclosed after persistent media inquiries, has ignited debate over transparency, corporate ethics, and the governance of Britain’s privatized water utilities.
Kelda Holdings, a Jersey-registered private entity and parent to Yorkshire Water, awarded Shaw £660,000 in both the 2023-24 and 2024-25 financial years. These payments were not included in Yorkshire Water Services’ public annual reports, bypassing scrutiny from both regulators and the public. Although legal under Jersey’s lenient corporate disclosure laws, critics argue the secrecy violates the public trust, especially as water companies remain under close watch due to repeated environmental violations and rising consumer costs.
Yorkshire Water maintains that the payments were tied to Shaw’s work on investor-related activities and were fully funded by shareholders, not bill payers. The company insists it met all disclosure obligations required by the UK’s water regulator, Ofwat. Still, the revelation has sparked fury among environmental groups, unions, and politicians.
The utility has been the subject of growing criticism following multiple fines and enforcement actions, including a £40 million settlement over excessive wastewater spills and an £850,000 fine for an environmental breach involving chlorinated water in 2017. These incidents, coupled with steadily increasing water bills, have led many to question whether the current private ownership structure serves the public interest.
GMB union officer Gary Carter lambasted the arrangement, calling the concealed offshore salary an affront to transparency. “This is another case of water companies not listening to the outrage and concerns of the public over the payment of unjustifiable salaries,” he said. “This sort of behaviour has got to end.”
Published figures showed Shaw’s reported pay from Yorkshire Water dropped by nearly a third between 2023-24 and 2024-25. However, with the offshore fees added, her total remuneration exceeded previous levels. Similar undisclosed payments were also made to the company’s chief financial officer, Paul Inman.
Labour MP Rachael Maskell of York Central condemned the situation, highlighting that ordinary customers, many of whom are struggling with living costs, deserve accountability and openness from essential service providers. She emphasized that such opaque practices only strengthen the case for returning water companies to public ownership and implementing comprehensive audit and corporate governance reforms.
As shareholders, including the Singaporean government and major institutional investors from the U.S., Germany, and Australia, continue to profit, public confidence in the water sector continues to erode. With major investment funds pouring money into water infrastructure, pressure is mounting on the government and regulators to ensure these profits are not secured at the expense of consumers and environmental standards.
The debate over executive pay, environmental accountability, and public service delivery is far from over, and Yorkshire Water’s latest controversy only deepens the urgency for systemic reform


























































































