Published: 05 December 2025
The English Chronicle Desk
The English Chronicle Online
The US House of Representatives has passed a measure aimed at limiting President Donald Trump’s ability to continue military operations against Iran without congressional approval, marking a significant bipartisan challenge to the White House’s handling of the conflict.
The resolution passed by a narrow 215-208 vote, with four Republican lawmakers joining Democrats in support. The measure seeks to require President Trump to withdraw US forces from the conflict or obtain formal authorization from Congress to continue military action.
Although largely symbolic and facing uncertain legal standing, the vote represents growing political pressure on the administration as fuel prices continue to rise and public opposition to the war intensifies.
The House vote marks the fourth attempt by lawmakers to rein in Trump’s war powers. A similar resolution advanced through the Senate in May but has yet to receive a full floor vote.
As a concurrent resolution, the measure would not require presidential approval if passed by the Senate. However, legal challenges could arise regarding its constitutional authority. The White House has already dismissed the effort, arguing that it infringes upon presidential powers as commander-in-chief.
The vote also highlights increasing divisions within the Republican Party. The development comes shortly after conservative lawmakers forced the administration to abandon plans for a proposed $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund intended to support political allies.
Republican Representatives Thomas Massie, Brian Fitzpatrick, Tom Barrett, and Warren Davidson joined Democrats in backing the resolution. Democratic Representative Jared Golden of Maine, who had opposed previous efforts, also voted in favor this time.
“Congress alone declares war, that’s something certainly we need to be protective of,” Barrett said following the vote. When asked whether he feared retaliation from Trump, he responded that he was prepared to stand by his decision and vote according to his conscience.
Representative Gregory Meeks, the leading Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee and a co-sponsor of the measure, described the outcome as a significant bipartisan rejection of what he called an “illegal and costly war.”
Meeks argued that the conflict had failed to achieve its objectives while contributing to higher energy prices and making diplomatic efforts regarding Iran’s nuclear programme more difficult.
“The passage of this measure today signals a significant turning point,” Meeks said. “More and more Republicans are listening to their constituents who do not want another open-ended war in the Middle East.”
The conflict began on 28 February when the United States and Israel launched coordinated strikes against Iran. Tehran responded with attacks on Israel and US-aligned Gulf states and effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important shipping routes.
In April, Washington announced a blockade on vessels travelling to and from Iran’s coastline. While the US and Iran reached an initial ceasefire agreement on 8 April, hostilities have continued intermittently.
Recent US strikes inside Iran prompted retaliatory attacks by Tehran against Kuwait, a key American ally in the Gulf region. Despite ongoing military exchanges, President Trump said negotiations were progressing positively and suggested a final agreement could be reached soon.
“We hit them pretty hard the night before, and actually last night,” Trump told reporters at the White House, referring to recent strikes. He added that both sides appeared close to reaching an agreement that could bring the conflict to an end.
According to the president, members of his administration remain hopeful that diplomacy can prevail and that a deal can be secured “without killing everybody.”
The House vote is likely to intensify debate in Washington over the balance of war powers between Congress and the presidency while increasing pressure on the administration to pursue a diplomatic resolution to the conflict.
Check Out Our Latest News At


























































































