Portland man pleads not guilty after Border Patrol shooting case

Published: 15 January 2026. The English Chronicle Desk. The English Chronicle Online.

Luis David Nino-Moncada, shot by a Border Patrol agent during an immigration stop in Portland, has pleaded not guilty to aggravated assault against a federal officer and damaging government property. The Portland man’s plea came on Wednesday following his indictment by the Department of Homeland Security, which alleges he entered the United States illegally and used his vehicle as a weapon against officers. Nino-Moncada, who sustained an arm injury from the shooting, appeared in court alongside Yorlenys Betzabeth Zambrano-Contreras, a Venezuelan woman who was shot and later taken into ICE custody after hospital treatment.

The Portland man case has raised significant concern among local leaders, who are demanding transparency regarding federal officers’ use of force. Federal officials claim Nino-Moncada reversed his pickup truck into an unoccupied car rented by Border Patrol, causing extensive damage to its headlights and front bumper. Investigators say no video evidence exists capturing the incident, and their conclusions rely solely on officer testimonies. DHS reports indicate an officer fired two shots as Nino-Moncada allegedly fled the scene, further complicating public perception.

Police sources say Nino-Moncada and Zambrano-Contreras may have links to Tren de Aragua, a Venezuelan gang, though no direct criminal charges related to gang activity have been filed. Portland Police Chief Bob Day confirmed they were previously investigated following a July shooting, but neither individual was identified as a suspect at the time. Community leaders have expressed frustration over these connections being cited during a high-profile immigration enforcement incident, arguing it risks inflaming tensions without clear proof.

This Portland man shooting mirrors national debates after Renee Good’s fatal encounter with federal officers in Minnesota, which sparked nationwide demonstrations. Critics have condemned aggressive federal immigration tactics, arguing agents’ actions disproportionately target communities already vulnerable to enforcement. In response, the Trump administration deployed additional officers to Minneapolis, calling it the largest operation in DHS history and defending officers under claims of federal immunity. Such claims have drawn scrutiny from legal experts who question the administration’s broad interpretation of protective authority.

Government officials insist immigration agents face increasing threats, citing dramatic percentage rises in assaults, vehicular attacks, and death threats. The DHS press release referenced numbers including a 1,300% rise in attacks and 8,000% increase in threats, though independent reviews of court records indicate most alleged assaults did not result in injury. Investigations by major media outlets, including the Los Angeles Times and Guardian, have highlighted misleading statements by immigration officers regarding protesters, suggesting discrepancies between official claims and documented incidents.

The Portland man incident has also intensified discussions surrounding accountability, with local and national activists emphasizing that transparency and oversight remain crucial. Critics argue that aggressive rhetoric by federal agencies, including threats toward public officials who question enforcement practices, undermines democratic principles. Stephen Miller, the administration’s deputy chief of staff, publicly warned of legal consequences for those obstructing federal officers, reinforcing perceptions of an uncompromising federal stance.

Legal experts caution that while federal immunity exists, its scope does not exempt officers from judicial review or public scrutiny. Cases like the Portland man’s highlight the tension between enforcing immigration law and maintaining civil rights protections. Observers note that incidents involving unarmed individuals or unclear threats can inflame public mistrust, particularly when communities perceive disproportionate force is used against marginalized populations.

Protests have continued across several states, with demonstrators citing both the Portland man and Minnesota shootings as examples of excessive federal enforcement measures. Activists argue that repeated confrontations between communities and federal agents risk escalating violence and eroding trust in law enforcement institutions. The current situation illustrates the broader challenge of balancing national security priorities with legal accountability and civil liberties.

As Nino-Moncada’s case moves through the judicial system, court proceedings will examine the precise circumstances surrounding the shooting. Federal prosecutors will rely on officer statements and property damage assessments, while defense attorneys are expected to contest the justification for use of force and question the credibility of DHS claims. Public interest in the case remains high, with media coverage emphasizing both the human consequences and legal complexities of immigration enforcement actions.

The Portland man incident underscores ongoing debates about federal immigration policies, transparency, and the limits of executive power. It also raises questions about the treatment of individuals with alleged gang associations and the consequences of high-profile enforcement actions. Legal analysts suggest the outcome of this case could influence future enforcement protocols and shape national conversations about accountability in federal operations.

Communities affected by aggressive federal actions continue to demand clear communication, independent investigations, and adherence to due process. Observers note that successful resolution of such cases requires balancing law enforcement authority with civil rights, ensuring justice is transparent, and preventing escalation of public unrest. The Portland man plea is thus emblematic of broader national tensions over immigration, law enforcement, and the reach of federal authority in local communities.

Check our latest news