Indian Activist Loses 11kg After 26-Day Hunger Strike but Says ‘I Am Still Alive’

Published: 20 July 2026 | The English Chronicle Desk | The English Chronicle Online

An Indian activist who has been on a hunger strike for 26 days has lost 11kg but insists he remains determined to continue his campaign, saying: “I am still alive.”

The prolonged hunger strike has drawn attention to the activist’s demands and raised concerns among supporters and medical professionals about the risks associated with extended fasting.

As the protest continues, questions are being raised about the government’s response, the activist’s health and the wider issue at the centre of the campaign.

The activist began the hunger strike as a form of protest, refusing food for more than three weeks in an effort to highlight his demands.

After 26 days without eating normally, he has reportedly experienced significant weight loss, with his body weight dropping by 11kg.

Supporters say the hunger strike demonstrates his commitment and determination, while doctors have warned that prolonged fasting can have serious effects on the body.

Despite concerns about his health, the activist has said he intends to continue until his demands are addressed.

Speaking during the protest, the activist reassured supporters that he was still alive and determined to continue.

His statement has become a symbol of his refusal to give up despite the physical toll of the hunger strike.

For many activists, hunger strikes represent a powerful form of peaceful protest, using personal sacrifice to draw attention to social and political issues.

However, such protests also raise difficult questions about health, responsibility and the pressure placed on individuals willing to risk their wellbeing for a cause.

Medical experts say extended hunger strikes can have serious consequences.

When the body does not receive sufficient nutrients, it begins using stored energy reserves before eventually affecting muscles and vital organs.

Weight loss is one of the most visible effects, but prolonged fasting can also lead to weakness, dizziness, low blood pressure and complications involving the heart and other systems.

Doctors monitoring hunger strikers often recommend regular health checks to assess their condition.

Hunger strikes have a long history as a method of political and social protest.

Activists often choose fasting because it creates moral pressure and attracts public attention.

Unlike traditional demonstrations, hunger strikes involve individuals using their own bodies as a message.

Throughout history, hunger strikes have been used by campaigners fighting for political rights, social reforms and recognition of particular causes.

Supporters argue that the method reflects commitment and non-violent resistance.

The activist’s supporters have continued to gather and express solidarity with his campaign.

They say his sacrifice reflects the seriousness of the issue he is raising.

Many have called for authorities to engage in dialogue and address the concerns behind the protest.

Supporters have also urged people to pay attention to the wider cause rather than focusing only on the hunger strike itself.

The ongoing protest has increased pressure on officials to respond.

Critics have questioned whether enough action has been taken to address the activist’s demands.

Governments often face difficult decisions during hunger strikes, balancing discussions with protesters while also considering public policy and legal issues.

Authorities may attempt negotiations, but agreements can be challenging when demands involve wider political or social changes.

The hunger strike has sparked debate across India about protest methods and the responsibilities of both activists and governments.

Some people have praised the activist’s determination, describing it as an example of courage and commitment.

Others have expressed concern about the dangers of prolonged fasting and the possibility of serious health consequences.

The debate reflects broader discussions about how citizens can express disagreement and seek change.

Social media has played an important role in spreading awareness about the protest.

Updates about the activist’s health and statements have been shared widely online, allowing supporters to follow developments.

Digital platforms have increasingly become central to modern activism, helping campaigns reach larger audiences.

At the same time, online discussions can sometimes become divided, with different groups interpreting events in different ways.

As the hunger strike continues, medical monitoring remains a key concern.

Doctors say regular assessments are important to identify warning signs and prevent potentially life-threatening complications.

In some cases, hunger strikers may require medical intervention if their condition becomes critical.

The decision to continue or end a hunger strike is often deeply personal and connected to the individual’s commitment to their cause.

After 26 days of fasting and an 11kg weight loss, the activist remains determined to continue his protest.

His statement, “I am still alive,” reflects both his resilience and his message that the campaign is not over.

The coming days are expected to bring further attention to his demands, his health and the response from authorities.

The protest has once again highlighted the powerful but risky role hunger strikes can play in social movements, where individuals make personal sacrifices in the hope of creating wider change.

Checkout Our Latest News On>>